Reputation: 9474
I am practicing using type hints in Python 3.5. One of my colleague uses typing.Dict
:
import typing
def change_bandwidths(new_bandwidths: typing.Dict,
user_id: int,
user_name: str) -> bool:
print(new_bandwidths, user_id, user_name)
return False
def my_change_bandwidths(new_bandwidths: dict,
user_id: int,
user_name: str) ->bool:
print(new_bandwidths, user_id, user_name)
return True
def main():
my_id, my_name = 23, "Tiras"
simple_dict = {"Hello": "Moon"}
change_bandwidths(simple_dict, my_id, my_name)
new_dict = {"new": "energy source"}
my_change_bandwidths(new_dict, my_id, my_name)
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
Both of them work just fine, there doesn't appear to be a difference.
I have read the typing
module documentation.
Between typing.Dict
or dict
which one should I use in the program?
Upvotes: 309
Views: 293033
Reputation: 402
For people using the new versions of Python: As of Python 3.9, you can specify the types of the keys and values using dict
directly, thanks to PEP 585. This means that you don't have to use typing.Dict
anymore; you can use dict
instead.
# Using typing.Dict (before Python 3.9)
from typing import Dict
new_bandwidths: Dict[str, int] = {"one": 1, "two": 2}
# Using builtins.dict (Python 3.9+)
new_bandwidths: dict[str, int] = {"one": 1, "two": 2}
Upvotes: 7
Reputation: 805
If you're coming from google for
TypeError: Too few parameters for typing.Dict; actual 1, expected 2
, you need to provide a type for both the key and value.
So, Dict[str, str]
instead of Dict[str]
Upvotes: 9
Reputation: 4291
as said in python org:
class typing.Dict(dict, MutableMapping[KT, VT])
A generic version of dict. Useful for annotating return types. To annotate arguments it is preferred to use an abstract collection type such as Mapping.
This type can be used as follows:
def count_words(text: str) -> Dict[str, int]:
...
But dict
is less general and you will be able to alter the mapping passed in.
In fact, in python.Dict
you specify more details.
Another tip:
Deprecated since version 3.9: builtins.dict now supports []. See PEP 585 and Generic Alias Type.
Upvotes: 18
Reputation: 1121734
There is no real difference between using a plain typing.Dict
and dict
, no.
However, typing.Dict
is a Generic type * that lets you specify the type of the keys and values too, making it more flexible:
def change_bandwidths(new_bandwidths: typing.Dict[str, str],
user_id: int,
user_name: str) -> bool:
As such, it could well be that at some point in your project lifetime you want to define the dictionary argument a little more precisely, at which point expanding typing.Dict
to typing.Dict[key_type, value_type]
is a 'smaller' change than replacing dict
.
You can make this even more generic by using Mapping
or MutableMapping
types here; since your function doesn't need to alter the mapping, I'd stick with Mapping
. A dict
is one mapping, but you could create other objects that also satisfy the mapping interface, and your function might well still work with those:
def change_bandwidths(new_bandwidths: typing.Mapping[str, str],
user_id: int,
user_name: str) -> bool:
Now you are clearly telling other users of this function that your code won't actually alter the new_bandwidths
mapping passed in.
Your actual implementation is merely expecting an object that is printable. That may be a test implementation, but as it stands your code would continue to work if you used new_bandwidths: typing.Any
, because any object in Python is printable.
*: Note: If you are using Python 3.7 or newer, you can use dict
as a generic type if you start your module with from __future__ import annotations
, and as of Python 3.9, dict
(as well as other standard containers) supports being used as generic type even without that directive.
Upvotes: 374
Reputation: 19811
typing.Dict
is a generic version of dict
:
class typing.Dict(dict, MutableMapping[KT, VT])
A generic version of dict. The usage of this type is as follows:
def get_position_in_index(word_list: Dict[str, int], word: str) -> int: return word_list[word]
Here you can specify the type of key and values in the dict: Dict[str, int]
Upvotes: 41