Reputation: 150643
If we're using the srcset
and sizes
attributes, it is still useful to specify a src
attribute as a fallback. Similarly, I imagine that older browsers would also take advantage of width
and height
attributes if they were specified. But do modern browsers?
For example:
<img
src="foo100x100.jpg"
srcset="foo100x100.jpg 100w, foo500x500.jpg 500w, foo900x900 900w"
sizes="100vw"
width="100"
height="100"
alt="example"
>
Are the width
and height
attributes of any use to a modern browser in this example?
Upvotes: 7
Views: 2203
Reputation: 150643
Based on experimentation, it behaves as if you had specified width
and height
CSS properties in pixels. However, it can be overridden by your own CSS.
img {
width: 200px;
/* height will be 100px because of the HTML attribute */
}
<img
src="http://placehold.it/100x100"
srcset="http://placehold.it/100x100 100w, http://placehold.it/500x500 500w"
sizes="100vw"
alt=""
width="100"
height="100"
>
This is a bit disappointing, as I was hoping that modern browsers would use width
and height
HTML attributes to determine what the aspect ratio of the image was before downloading the image, so as to avoid the layout of following content jumping around as the page loads.
Upvotes: 5