CODEWITHSUNDEEP
swiftrealmequatable
Thomas G.
Thomas G.

Reputation: 1003

RealmObject Equatable redundant message

We have a simple class Person which inherent from realms Object. Now we want that subclass to conform to the Equatable protocol. The very simple code looks like this. 

class Person: Object, Equatable {

    dynamic var localID     = "0"
    dynamic var name:String?
}

func ==(lhs: Person, rhs: Person) -> Bool {

    return lhs.localID == rhs.localID
}

We started with realm version 0.98.8 and everything worked as aspected. When we updated to version 0.102.0 (and the other versions between) the complier error message occurs 

Error: Redundant conformance of ‚Person‘ to protocol ‚Equatable‘

Not strange enough, if downgrade back to version 0.98.8 the error still remains. Another strange behavior, on one of our developers machine, the same code compiles just fine.

After some research we have no idea what is going on and how to fix or workaround this.

Upvotes: 8

Views: 2774

Answers (3)

Eli Burke
Eli Burke

Reputation: 2789

The updated signature for Swift 4 is:

open override func isEqual(_ object: Any?) -> Bool {
    return true
}

Upvotes: 4

Julien Quere
Julien Quere

Reputation: 2459

In RealmSwift, Object is already conforming to Equatable. So you don't have to add the Equatable in the definition of Person.

But you do not seem to be the only one having problems with this.

Upvotes: 0

mro
mro

Reputation: 191

Latest version of RealmSwift implements Equatable by default, you can look at Object.swift from RealmSwift code.

To override default Equatable behaviour, you can override this function:

public override func isEqual(object: AnyObject?) -> Bool

After that, existing Swift code with == will return result based on custom condition defined inside isEqual. No need to create func == manually.

It's still using isEqual due to RLMObjectBase subclassed from NSObject, not pure Swift object.

Upvotes: 13

Related Questions