Reputation: 484
I've been trying to use the new Angular 1.5 component
syntax in a project, but I can't figure out how to inject a dependency into the component definition.
Here's my attempt at refactoring an existing directive to a component:
angular
.module('app.myModule')
.component('row', {
bindings: {
details: '@',
zip: '@'
},
controller: 'RowController',
templateUrl: basePath + 'modules/row.html' // basePath needs to be injected
})
For various reasons, we inject the constant basePath
into all of our directives as part of the templateUrl.
How do I do this on a component, since the component definition is not a function?
Upvotes: 13
Views: 3219
Reputation: 193251
You can use a function for templateUrl
to construct URL. However, unlike the one for directives, component templateUrl
function is injectable (ref docs), which means that you can inject constant (or any other injectable service) into it. Exactly what you need:
.component('row', {
bindings: {
details: '@',
zip: '@'
},
controller: 'RowController',
templateUrl: function(basePath, $rootScope) { // $rootScope is an example here
return basePath + 'modules/row.html'
}
})
Minification-safe array notation is also supported:
templateUrl: ['basePath', '$rootScope', function(basePath, $rootScope) {
return basePath + 'modules/row.html'
}]
Demo: http://plnkr.co/edit/jAIqkzZGnaEVPaUjyBrJ?p=preview
Upvotes: 14