Reputation: 211
Let's say I have two (large) vectors a=[0 0 0 0 0]
and b=[1 2 3 4 5]
of the same size and one index vector ind=[1 5 2 1]
with values in {1,...,length(a)}. I would like to compute
for k = 1:length(ind)
a(ind(k)) = a(ind(k)) + b(ind(k));
end
% a = [2 2 0 0 5]
That is, I want to add those entries of b
declared in ind
to a
including multiplicity.
a(ind)=a(ind)+b(ind);
% a = [1 2 0 0 5]
is much faster, of course, but ignores indices which appear multiple times.
How can I speed up the above code?
Upvotes: 4
Views: 49
Reputation: 112659
Another approach based on accumarray
:
a(:) = a(:) + accumarray(ind(:), b(ind(:)), [numel(a) 1]);
How it works
accumarray
with two column vectors as inputs aggregates the values of the second input corresponding to the same index in the first. The third input is used here to force the result to be the same size as a
, padding with zeros if needed.
Upvotes: 3
Reputation: 65430
We can use unique
to identify the unique index values and use the third output to determine which elements of ind
share the same index. We can then use accumarray
to sum all the elements of b
which share the same index. We then add these to the original value of a
at these locations.
[uniqueinds, ~, inds] = unique(ind);
a(uniqueinds) = a(uniqueinds) + accumarray(inds, b(ind)).';
If max(inds) == numel(a)
then this could be simplified to the following since accumarray
will simply return 0
for any missing entry in ind
.
a(:) = a(:) + accumarray(ind(:), b(ind));
Upvotes: 5