Reputation: 3052
I'm getting following error if I don't annotate the dependencies for an inline controller function for a route (I'm using strict DI mode and all other codes are annotated so that js-minification doesn't break my code):
https://docs.angularjs.org/error/$injector/strictdi?p0=function(AuthService,%20$state
Here is the logout route code:
app.config(['$stateProvider', '$urlRouterProvider', function($stateProvider', '$urlRouterProvider) {
$stateProvider.state('logout', {
url: '/logout',
controller: function(AuthService, $state) {
AuthService.logout();
$state.go('login');
}
}
}]);
Is there any technique to declare inline annotation for the above two dependent services (AuthService, $state) of the inline controller ?
I know the bellow work-around :
.state('logout', {
url: '/logout',
controller: LogoutController
});
function LogoutController (AuthService, $state) {
AuthService.logout();
$state.go('login');
}
LogoutController.$inject = ['AuthService', '$state'];
this works but just wanted to checkout if anyone knows any smart short-cut ?
Upvotes: 0
Views: 283
Reputation: 7136
Just to add more details here, this is expected for inline controllers.
See https://github.com/olov/ng-annotate/issues/50.
Either not inline them or add apply controller: /* @ngInject */ function(service1){ ... }
.
The /* @ngInject */ tells ngannotate to apply annotation here.
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 5977
Try
app.config(['$stateProvider', '$urlRouterProvider', function($stateProvider, $urlRouterProvider) {
$stateProvider.state('logout', {
url: '/logout',
controller: ['AuthService', '$state', function(AuthService, $state) {
AuthService.logout();
$state.go('login');
}]
}
}]);
Not sure if that will work. Usually we separate our controllers into files for ease of use, rather than writing them inline in the config.route.js file.
Upvotes: 1