Reputation: 5039
I have a subproject where I put all my QTest
unit tests and build a stand-alone test application that runs the tests (i.e. I run it from within Qt Creator). I have multiple test classes that I can execute with qExec()
. However I don't know what is the proper way to execute multiple test classes.
Currently I do it in this way (MVCE):
QT -= gui
QT += core \
testlib
CONFIG += console
CONFIG -= app_bundle
TEMPLATE = app
TARGET = testrunner
HEADERS += test_foo.h
SOURCES += main.cpp
#include <QtTest>
#include <QCoreApplication>
#include "test_foo.h"
int main(int argc, char** argv) {
QCoreApplication app(argc, argv);
TestFooClass testFoo;
TestBarClass testBar;
// NOTE THIS LINE IN PARTICULAR.
return QTest::qExec(&testFoo, argc, argv) || QTest::qExec(&testBar, argc, argv);
}
#include <QtTest>
class TestFooClass: public QObject
{
Q_OBJECT
private slots:
void test_func_foo() {};
};
class TestBarClass: public QObject
{
Q_OBJECT
private slots:
void test_func_bar() {};
};
However the documentation for qExec()
says this is the wrong way:
For stand-alone test applications, this function should not be called more than once, as command-line options for logging test output to files and executing individual test functions will not behave correctly.
The other major downside is that there is no single summary for all the test classes, only for individual classes. This is a problem when I have dozens of classes that each have dozens of tests. To check if all tests passed I have to scroll up to see all the "Totals" of what passed/failed of each class, e.g.:
********* Start testing of TestFooClass *********
PASS : TestFooClass::initTestCase()
PASS : TestFooClass::test_func_foo()
PASS : TestFooClass::cleanupTestCase()
Totals: 3 passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped, 0 blacklisted
********* Finished testing of TestFooClass *********
********* Start testing of TestBarClass *********
PASS : TestBarClass::initTestCase()
PASS : TestBarClass::test_func_bar()
PASS : TestBarClass::cleanupTestCase()
Totals: 3 passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped, 0 blacklisted
********* Finished testing of TestBarClass *********
I'm also surprised my qExec() || qExec()
works considering that the documentation says if a test failed qExec()
returns a non-zero value, which should mean all the following qExec()
calls wouldn't happen, but this seems not to be the case.
What is the proper way to run multiple test classes? And so that I can see at a glance if any of the hundreds of unit tests I have have failed.
Upvotes: 18
Views: 6879
Reputation: 6231
To execute multiple test classes contained in a single test project, including auto-detection of test classes (by simply deriving from TestClass
) and having a nice summary printed at the end, use the following code:
#include "TestClass.h"
class FooTestClass : public TestClass {
Q_OBJECT
private:
Q_SLOT void fooTest1() { }
Q_SLOT void fooTest2() { }
};
// Note: C++17 style inline variable. In C++11, use a static variable instead.
inline FooTestClass fooTests;
#include "TestClass.h"
class BarTestClass : public TestClass {
Q_OBJECT
private:
Q_SLOT void barTest1() { }
Q_SLOT void barTest2() { }
};
// Note: C++17 style inline variable. In C++11, use a static variable instead.
inline BarTestClass barTests;
#include "TestClass.h"
int main(int argc, char **argv) {
return TestClass::runAllTests(argc, argv);
}
#include <QDebug>
#include <QObject>
#include <QString>
#include <QTest>
class TestClass : public QObject {
Q_OBJECT
private:
static QObjectList &testObjects() { static QObjectList testObjects; return testObjects; }
public:
TestClass() { testObjects().append(this); }
static int runAllTests(int argc, char **argv) {
// Sort test objects by class name.
std::sort(testObjects().begin(), testObjects().end(), [] (const QObject *a, const QObject *b) {
return strcmp(a->metaObject()->className(), b->metaObject()->className()) < 0;
});
// Run all tests.
QStringList results;
int passed = 0;
for (QObject *testObject : testObjects()) {
bool success = false;
try {
success = QTest::qExec(testObject, argc, argv) == EXIT_SUCCESS;
} catch (...) { }
qDebug() << "";
results << QString("%1 : %2").arg(success ? "PASS " : "FAIL!").arg(testObject->metaObject()->className());
passed += success ? 1 : 0;
}
// Print summary.
int tested = testObjects().size();
results << QString("Totals: %1 tested, %2 passed, %3 failed").arg(tested).arg(passed).arg(tested - passed);
results << QString("Result: %1").arg(tested == passed ? "All tests PASSED." : "Some tests FAILED!");
qDebug() << "********* Start of summary *********";
for (const QString &line : results) {
qDebug() << line.toUtf8().data();
}
qDebug() << "********* End of summary *********";
qDebug() << "";
return tested == passed ? EXIT_SUCCESS : EXIT_FAILURE;
}
};
********* Start testing of BarTestClass *********
Config: Using QtTest library 5.15.12, Qt 5.15.12 (x86_64-little_endian-llp64 shared (dynamic) release build; by GCC 13.2.0), windows 10
PASS : BarTestClass::initTestCase()
PASS : BarTestClass::barTest1()
PASS : BarTestClass::barTest2()
PASS : BarTestClass::cleanupTestCase()
Totals: 4 passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped, 0 blacklisted, 2ms
********* Finished testing of BarTestClass *********
********* Start testing of FooTestClass *********
Config: Using QtTest library 5.15.12, Qt 5.15.12 (x86_64-little_endian-llp64 shared (dynamic) release build; by GCC 13.2.0), windows 10
PASS : FooTestClass::initTestCase()
PASS : FooTestClass::fooTest1()
PASS : FooTestClass::fooTest2()
PASS : FooTestClass::cleanupTestCase()
Totals: 4 passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped, 0 blacklisted, 1ms
********* Finished testing of FooTestClass *********
********* Start of summary *********
PASS : BarTestClass
PASS : FooTestClass
Totals: 2 tested, 2 passed, 0 failed
Result: All tests PASSED.
********* End of summary *********
The documentation of QTest::qExec says that this function shouldn't be called more than once because "command-line options for logging test output to files and executing individual test functions will not behave correctly".
That's true, but it's only a minor issue. Just keep in mind that some of the QtTest command line options won't work as intended. If you don't pass any command line options at all, then you're fine in any case.
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 1123
I once found a nice solution using a plain Qt project (no TEMPLATE = subdirs
) which uses a macro approach for creating the main function and automatic registering of all test classes (macro, too) with only a simple helper header file.
Here is a sample test class (only the relevant header file):
#ifndef FOOTESTS_H
#define FOOTESTS_H
#include "AutoTest.h"
class FooTests : public QObject
{
Q_OBJECT
private slots:
void initTestCase();
void test1();
void test2();
void cleanupTestCase();
};
DECLARE_TEST(FooTests)
#endif // FOOTESTS_H
and the main, which consumes every test class created this way:
#include "AutoTest.h"
TEST_MAIN
The code of AutoTest.h
:
#ifndef AUTOTEST_H
#define AUTOTEST_H
#include <QTest>
#include <QList>
#include <QString>
#include <QSharedPointer>
namespace AutoTest
{
typedef QList<QObject*> TestList;
inline TestList& testList()
{
static TestList list;
return list;
}
inline bool findObject(QObject* object)
{
TestList& list = testList();
if (list.contains(object))
{
return true;
}
foreach (QObject* test, list)
{
if (test->objectName() == object->objectName())
{
return true;
}
}
return false;
}
inline void addTest(QObject* object)
{
TestList& list = testList();
if (!findObject(object))
{
list.append(object);
}
}
inline int run(int argc, char *argv[])
{
int ret = 0;
foreach (QObject* test, testList())
{
ret += QTest::qExec(test, argc, argv);
}
return ret;
}
}
template <class T>
class Test
{
public:
QSharedPointer<T> child;
Test(const QString& name) : child(new T)
{
child->setObjectName(name);
AutoTest::addTest(child.data());
}
};
#define DECLARE_TEST(className) static Test<className> t(#className);
#define TEST_MAIN \
int main(int argc, char *argv[]) \
{ \
return AutoTest::run(argc, argv); \
}
#endif // AUTOTEST_H
All credits goes to Rob Caldecott.
Upvotes: 11