Paul Merrill
Reputation: 620
Differences between tr1::shared_ptr and boost::shared_ptr?
Are there any difference between tr1::shared_ptr and boost::shared_ptr? If so, what?
Upvotes: 13
Views: 2208
Answers (1)
Karl von Moor
Reputation: 8614
No, the documentation of boost shared_ptr says:
This implementation conforms to the TR1 specification, with the only exception that it resides in namespace boost instead of std::tr1.
Upvotes: 20
Related Questions
- Difference between `const shared_ptr<T>` and `shared_ptr<const T>`?
- boost::shared_ptr and std::shared_ptr co-existence
- Cohabitation of boost::shared_ptr and std::shared_ptr
- Differences between different flavours of shared_ptr
- boost::shared_ptr vs std::tr1::shared_ptr on multi os compilation
- Boost shared_ptr issue with TR1 libraries
- What is the difference between returning a boost::shared_ptr and constructing a boost::shared_ptr from a returned raw pointer?
- Difference between boost::shared_ptr and std::shared_ptr from the standard <memory> file
- Differences between VS2010's std::shared_ptr and boost::shared_ptr
- Confusion concerning boost::shared_ptr