CODEWITHSUNDEEP
c#linq-to-sqlauto-increment
David Vidmar
David Vidmar

Reputation: 3036

Correctly incrementing values using Linq to SQL

I have a MS SQL table that I don't have any control over and I need to write to. This table has a int primary key that isn't automatically incremented. I can't use stored procs and I would like to use Linq to SQL since it makes other processing very easy.

My current solution is to read the last value, increment it, try to use it, if I get a clash, increment it again and retry.

Something along these lines:

var newEntity = new Log()
{
    ID = dc.Logs.Max(l => l.ID) + 1,
    Note = "Test"       
};

dc.Logs.InsertOnSubmit(newEntity);

const int maxRetries = 10;
int retries = 0;

bool success = false;
while (!success && retries < maxRetries)
{               
    try
    {                                                           
        dc.SubmitChanges();
        success = true;
    }
    catch (SqlException)
    {
        retries++;
        newEntity.ID = dc.Logs.Max(l => l.ID);                  
    }
}           
if (retries >= maxRetries)
{
    throw new Exception("Bummer...");
}

Does anyone have a better solution?

EDIT: Thanks to Jon, I simplified the max ID calculation. I was still in SQL thinking mode.

Upvotes: 2

Views: 3858

Answers (4)

P P Vilsad
P P Vilsad

Reputation: 1

Make the id field auto incrementing and let the server handle id generation.

Otherwise, you will run into the problem liggett78 said. Nothing prevents another thread from reading the same id in between the reading and submitting of max id for this thread.

Upvotes: 0

alextansc
alextansc

Reputation: 4672

You could put the entire operation in a transaction, using a TransactionScope class, like below:

using  (TransactionScope scope = new TransactionScope()){
   var maxId = dc.Logs.Max(s => s.ID); 
   var newEntity = new Log(){        
       ID = maxId,        
       Note = "Test"           
   };
   dc.Logs.InsertOnSubmit(newEntity);
   dc.SubmitChanges();
   scope.Complete();
}

By putting both the retrieval of the maximum ID and the insertion of the new records within the same transaction, you should be able to pull off an insert without having to retry in your manner.

One problem you might face with this method will be transaction deadlocks, especially if the table is heavily used. Do test it out to see if you require additional error-handling.

P.S. I included Jon Skeet's code to get the max ID in my code, because I'm pretty sure it will work correctly. :)

Upvotes: 0

liggett78
liggett78

Reputation: 11358

You didn't indicate whether your app is the only one inserting into the table. If it is, then I'd fetch the max value once right after the start of the app/webapp and use Interlocked.Increment on it every time you need next ID (or simple addition if possible race conditions can be ruled out).

Upvotes: 0

Jon Skeet
Jon Skeet

Reputation: 1502176

That looks like an expensive way to get the maximum ID. Have you already tried

var maxId = dc.Logs.Max(s => s.ID);

? Maybe it doesn't work for some reason, but I really hope it does...

(Admittedly it's more than possible that SQL Server optimises this appropriately.)

Other than that, it looks okay (smelly, but necessarily so) to me - but I'm not an expert on the matter...

Upvotes: 2

Related Questions