alex
alex

Reputation: 7905

SWRL : ^ not work on protege 4.3

I'm trying to add a SWRL rule to protege using conjuction sign ^ but Protege 4.3 does not approve that sign.

This issue is also present for swrl buildins such as swrlb:lessThanOrEqual.

Screenshot

What's wrong with ^? May I use , instead?

Upvotes: 0

Views: 614

Answers (1)

Joshua Taylor
Joshua Taylor

Reputation: 85883

The terms in the Protege SWRL editor are separated by commas, not ^. See, for instance, the screenshots in my answer to SWRL rules in protege 3.4.8.

whats wrong with ^ ? may i use , instead ?

That the answer, yes. I'm not sure what prevented you from trying it in your own running Protege, though.

Upvotes: 1

Related Questions