Reputation: 8096
I have the following query
select paaf.assignment_id,
paaf.position_id,
paaf.effective_start_date effective_start_date,
paaf.effective_end_date effective_end_date
from per_all_assignments_f paaf
where paaf.position_id is not null
and paaf.assignment_type in ('E', 'C')
and paaf.primary_flag = 'Y'
and paaf.assignment_number like '209384%'
order by 3
Which returns
"assignment_id" "position_id" "effective_start_date" "effective_end_date"
6518 5323 01/01/2013 28/02/2014
6518 8133 01/03/2014 30/06/2014
6518 8133 01/07/2014 31/10/2015
6518 239570 01/11/2015 15/11/2015
6518 239570 16/11/2015 31/12/2015
6518 8133 01/01/2016 27/07/2016
6518 8133 28/07/2016 31/12/4712
I grouped this using:
select paaf.assignment_id,
paaf.position_id,
min(paaf.effective_start_date) effective_start_date,
max(paaf.effective_end_date) effective_end_date
from per_all_assignments_f paaf
where paaf.position_id is not null
and paaf.assignment_type in ('E', 'C')
and paaf.primary_flag = 'Y'
and paaf.assignment_number like '209384%'
group by paaf.assignment_id, paaf.position_id
Which returns:
"assignment_id" "position_id" "effective_start_date" "effective_end_date"
6518 5323 01/01/2013 28/02/2014
6518 8133 01/03/2014 31/12/4712
6518 239570 01/11/2015 31/12/2015
But I need a query that returns
"assignment_id" "position_id" "effective_start_date" "effective_end_date"
6518 5323 01/01/2013 28/02/2014
6518 8133 01/03/2014 31/10/2015
6518 239570 01/11/2015 31/12/2015
6518 8133 01/01/2016 31/12/4712
That is to say the position_id of 8133 must have two rows since there are two sections chronologically that must be grouped into 2 rows and not 1 (for 8133).
Is there some way of accomplishing this using the date order?
The answer turned out to be:
with paaf as
(
select paaf.assignment_id,
paaf.position_id,
paaf.effective_start_date effective_start_date,
paaf.effective_end_date effective_end_date
from per_all_assignments_f paaf
where paaf.position_id is not null
and paaf.assignment_type in ('E', 'C')
and paaf.primary_flag = 'Y'
-- and paaf.assignment_number like '209384%'
order by 1, 3
)
select paaf2.assignment_id,
paaf2.position_id,
min(paaf2.effective_start_date) as effective_start_date,
max(paaf2.effective_end_date) as effective_end_date
from (
select paaf.*,
row_number() over (order by paaf.assignment_id, paaf.effective_start_date) as seqnum,
row_number() over (partition by paaf.assignment_id, paaf.position_id order by paaf.assignment_id, paaf.effective_start_date) as seqnum_p
from paaf
) paaf2
group by (paaf2.seqnum - paaf2.seqnum_p), paaf2.assignment_id, paaf2.position_id
Upvotes: 0
Views: 87
Reputation: 1269483
This is a gaps-and-islands problem. There are different approaches, but a simple one uses a difference of row number:
with paaf as (<your first query here>
)
select paaf.assignment_id,
paaf.position_id,
min(paaf.effective_start_date) as effective_start_date,
max(paaf.effective_end_date) as effective_end_date
from (select paaf.*,
row_number() over (order by effective_start_date) as seqnum,
row_number() over (partition by position_id order by effective_start_date) as seqnum_p
from paaf
) paaf
group by (seqnum - seqnum_p), position_id, assignment_id;
Upvotes: 2