Reputation: 1027
We're in the design phase for building an audit trail in an existing web application. The application runs on Windows Azure and uses a SQL Azure database.
The audit logs must be filtered by user, or by object type (eg. show all action of a user, or show all actions that are performed on a object).
We have to choose how to store the data, should we use SQL Azure, or should we use table storage? We prefer table storage (cheaper)..
however the 'problem' with table storage is how to define the partition key. We have several thousand customers (the appplication users) in our SQL database, each in their own tenant. Using the tenant ID as partition key is not specific enough, so we have to add something to the partition key. So there's the issue: given the requirements for filtering, we can add a user ID to the partition key to make filtering by user easy, or we can add an object ID to make filtering by object easy.
So we see two possible solutions:
- use SQL Azure instead of table storage
- use table storage and use two tables with different partition keys, which means we duplicate all entries
Any ideas what's the best approach for our situation? Are there other, better solutions?
Upvotes: 7
Views: 3262
Reputation: 15227
If you're worried about filtering in multiple ways - you could always write the same data to multiple partitions. It works really well. For example, in our app we have Staff and Customers. When there is an interaction we want to track/trace that applied to both of them (perhaps an over the phone Purchase), we will write the same information (typically as json) to our audit tables.
{
PurchaseId: 9485,
CustomerId: 138,
StaffId: 509,
ProductId: 707958,
Quantity: 20
Price: 31.99,
Date: '2017-08-15 15:48:39'
}
And we will write that same row to the following partitions: Product_707958
, Customer_138
, Staff_509
. The row key is the same across the three rows in each partition: Purchase_9485
. Now if I want to go and query everything that has happened for a given staff, customer, or item, I just grab the whole partition. The storage is dirt cheap, so who cares if you write it to multiple places?
Also, an idea for you considering you have multiple tenants - you could make the table name Tenant_[SomeId]
. There are some other issues you might have to deal with, but it is in a sense another key to get at schema-less data.
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 13918
Azure Table Storage is appropriate to store log data. As Azure App services use Azure Table Storage to store the diagnosis logs.
In think you can consider to set the PartitionKey
as your user's tenant name, and the RowKey
is the user's ID. As according the Table Storage Data Model, we only need to keep:
Together the
PartitionKey
andRowKey
uniquely identify every entity within a table
Alternatively, you can clarify your concern about:
Using the tenant ID as partition key is not specific enough, so we have to add something to the partition key
Additionally, you can refer https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/documentation/articles/storage-table-design-guide/#overview for more info about design Azure Table Storage.
Any update, please feel free to let me know.
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 974
DocumentDB on Azure might be worth considering. https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/documentation/articles/documentdb-use-cases/ You can have audit trail stored in DocDB as JSON documents (user, activity, object fields and can index on all fields )
Upvotes: 2