Reputation: 5963
I want to know if the condition evaluation is executed in for
and while
loops in Java every time the loop cycle finishes.
Example:
int[] tenBig = new int[]{1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10};
for(int index = 0;index < tenBig.length;index++){
System.out.println("Value at index: "+tenBig[index]);
}
Will the index < tenBig.length
be execute every time the loop cycle finishes?
Assumption and experience tells me yes.
I know that in this example the tenBig.length
is a constant, so there won't be a performance impact.
But lets assume that the condition operation takes long in a different case.
I know the logical thing to do then is to assign the tenBig.length
to a variable.
Still I want to be sure that its evaluated every time.
Upvotes: 12
Views: 12913
Reputation: 1074266
Yes. Specifically, the condition part is executed before each loop body. So it's entirely possible that you never enter the body of the loop at all.
So taking your example:
for(int index = 0;index < tenBig.length;index++) {
/* ...body... */
}
This is the logical (not literal) equivalent:
int index = 0;
while (index < tenBig.length) { // happens on each loop
/* ...body... */
index++;
}
Upvotes: 6
Reputation: 14863
Short Answer: the condition is evaluated every time so:
WRONG:
for (int i = 0; i < Math.random() * 50; i++) {
System.out.println("" + i);
}
CORRECT:
double random = Math.random();
for (int i = 0; i < random * 50; i++) {
System.out.println("" + i);
}
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 596
index < tenBig.length
will be execute before every time the loop cycle starts.
public static void main(String[] args) {
int[] tenBig = new int[] { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 };
for (int index = 0; isEvaluated() && index < tenBig.length; index++) {
System.out.println("Value at index: " + tenBig[index]);
}
}
public static boolean isEvaluated() {
System.out.println("evaluated");
return true;
}
It will print "evaluated"
just before cycles starts. And one more time before loop finishes.
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 7305
Here are several bytecode compiling examples from the JVM spec.
As far as I know, the condition will be evaluated every time.
Regards.
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 455020
If the conditional expression is a loop invariant and you are running in JIT mode, loop optimizations such as Loop-invariant code motion can be done.
But when run in the interpreted mode, I guess there is not much optimization to do.
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 245419
Yes, the expression must be evaluated for each iteration of the loop to determine whether to stay inside the loop or continue program execution.
Remember, you can do things like this:
for(int a = 0, z = 26; a < z; a++, z--){
// Do some work
}
In that case, both sides of the expression will change and must be evaluated for each iteration.
And you're right, if you have calculations in the for loop condition that can be moved out to a separate variable, you should do that:
for(int i = 0; i < ((someCount / 2) * 21.6); i++){
}
Could easily be:
int maxVal = (someCount / 2) * 21.6;
for(int i=0; i < maxVal; i++){
{
Upvotes: 4
Reputation: 1141
It's going to be executed everytime the loop is entered, including the last evaluation which will yield index < length = false . Aside from this, even though the length of tenBig is const, the loop will always access this property so it would be ideal to assign it to a variable (even though it's not a reasonable speed gain in your example).
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 2874
Do you ask wether the compiler caches the tenBig.length value since he knows it won't change during the loop? Or you ask wether the compiler automatically knows that the whole expression index < tenBig.length does not need to be evaluated for the next 9 times?
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 1500485
Yes, it will logically evaluate the whole of the middle operand on every iteration of the loop. In cases where the JIT knows better, of course, it can do clever things (even potentially removing the array bounds check within the loop, based on the loop conditions).
Note that for types that the JIT doesn't know about, it may not be able to optimize specifically like this - but may still inline things like fetching the size()
of an ArrayList<T>
.
Finally, I generally prefer the enhanced for loop for readability:
for (int value : tenBig) {
...
}
Of course, that's assuming you don't need the index for other reasons.
Upvotes: 13