Reputation: 7905
Lets say there is a class "Food" containing individuals "Grain" and "Fruit" .
If i want to select Grain i can assign a food_type
data Property to individuals
(class) Food
(ind_1) Grain food_type ---> "grain_food"
(ind_2) Fruit food_type ---> "fruit_food"
and run this code:
Food(?x) ^ food_type(?x,"grain_food") -> sqwrl:select(?x)
but what if i want to do this job (select Grain
individual) without the needing to food_type
property? is it possible to directly point to a specific individual just by its name?
Upvotes: 2
Views: 610
Reputation: 85883
It's not exactly clear what you're asking, but yes, you can use an individual in a SWRL rule. E.g., if you have an individual c from class C, you can do:
C(c) ⟶ sqwrl:select(c)
As long as sqwrl:select doesn't necessarily require a variable (i.e., as long as it can accept an individual directly), this should be fine. If it requires a variable, as opposed to an individual directly (which would go against the intent, I think), I guess you could use some kind of equality predicate, like swrbl:equal:
swrlb:equal(c,?x) ⟶ sqwrl:select(?x)
Upvotes: 3