Reputation: 1219
I have to perform Update of a relatively very large table (80M of records) Invoice_Payment
. It should update data from another table Invoice_Payment_updated
which is 10%-15% of Invoice_Payment
in row count.
To illustrate please take a look at the following demo tables:
Invoice_Payment Invoice_Payment_updated
--------------- -----------------------
Customer_id Invoice_no Id Cust_id Invoice_no
10 10100001 1 10 20200100
11 10100002 2 11 20200101
12 10100003
13 10100004
I know Merge is usually used to perform an UPSERT and it takes several times longer to execute than equivalent Update statement. But in comparison, there are some cases that a normal update statement with multiple sub-queries gives lower performance.
MERGE INTO Invoice_Payment ip
USING (SELECT ipu.Cust_id, ipu.Invoice_no from Invoice_Payment_updated ipu
INNER JOIN Invoice_Payment ip ON ip.Customer_id = ipu.Cust_id
WHERE ipu.Cust_id = ip.Customer_id and ipu.Invoice_no <> ip.Invoice_no) t
ON (ip.Customer_id = t.Cust_id)
WHEN MATCHED THEN
UPDATE SET ip.Invoice_no = t.Invoice_no;
To improve performance, I can batch up the updates using ROWCOUNT, but that won't speed up the execution, it'll only help with reducing overall locking.
Following simple Update statement which returns same output:
UPDATE Invoice_Payment
SET Invoice_no = (SELECT ipu.Invoice_no
FROM Invoice_Payment_updated ipu
WHERE ipu.Cust_id = Invoice_Payment.Customer_id
AND ipu.Invoice_no <> Invoice_Payment.Invoice_no)
WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1
FROM Invoice_Payment_updated ipu
WHERE ipu.Cust_id = Invoice_Payment.Customer_id
AND ipu.Invoice_no <> Invoice_Payment.Invoice_no);
Idea to use SQL Merge and Update is a very clever one but I heard that both of them fails in performance issues when I need to update many records (i.e. over 75M) in a big and wide table. Furthermore, recreating the full table is a lot of IO load, not to mention it'll take up a lot of space to basically have the table stored several times temporarily because of using subqueries.
Another approach to resolve this issue using temporary table:
CREATE TABLE tmp (
Cust_id int,
Invoice_no int);
INSERT INTO tmp_stage VALUES
(SELECT ipu.Cust_id, ipu.Invoice_no FROM Invoice_Payment_updated ipu
INNER JOIN Invoice_Payment ip ON ip.Customer_id = ipu.Cust_id
WHERE ipu.Cust_id = ip.Customer_id and ipu.Invoice_no <> ip.Invoice_no);
UPDATE (SELECT tmp.Cust_id, ip.Customer_id, tmp.Invoice_no, tgt.Invoice_no
FROM tmp INNER JOIN Invoice_Payment ip
ON tmp.Cust_id = ip.Customer_id)
SET tmp.Invoice_no = ip.Invoice_no;
I want to figure out which one is better to use in case of multiple Subqueries?
Any thoughts are welcome and a totally different solution to the original problem is much appreciated.
Upvotes: 2
Views: 121
Reputation: 2882
UPDATE i
SET i.Invoice_no = io.Invoice_no
FROM Invoice_Payment i
INNER JOIN Invoice_Payment_updated io on i.Customer_id = io.cust_id
WHERE i.Invoice_no <> iu.Invoice_no -- assuming Invoice_no cannot be NULL
If that update takes too much time, add WHILE
loop and update TOP (10000)
till @@ROWCOUNT = 0
. Batching mode CAN improve the performance.
Upvotes: 2