Reputation: 1003
When trying to connect two containers on my ubuntu 16.04 host, I can not send messages from one container to the other, while the adress is available at the host.
I started one container (which provides a syslog-service by syslog-ng
) with:
docker run -d -p 127.0.0.1:515:514/udp --name syslog-ng bobrik/syslog-ng
This container is defined in: https://github.com/bobrik/docker-syslog-ng . According to https://www.balabit.com/documents/syslog-ng-ose-latest-guides/en/syslog-ng-ose-guide-admin/html/configuring-sources-network.html the udp(ip(0.0.0.0), port(514));
in the syslog-ng.conf should make it possible to accept all ip-connections.
Now I can log from the host to the container using:
logger -n 127.0.0.1 -P 515 test123
The second container was started with (one time with the --link
, once without)
docker run -it --link syslog-ng ubuntu /bin/bash
and in both cases, the logging is not available to the container, i.e.
logger -n 127.0.0.3 -P 515
returns no error message, but no message is added to the log either. (Tried it also with 127.0.0.1 and syslog-ng in case of the linked container).
So the question is: Why is logging in the container not possible?
If I start another container, both are on the same network, docker network inspect bridge
returns:
[
{
"Name": "bridge",
"Id": "6836c8a52555f30f27001daf9b111ad41a035a31783250e043c34602ea83cfe3",
"Scope": "local",
"Driver": "bridge",
"EnableIPv6": false,
"IPAM": {
"Driver": "default",
"Options": null,
"Config": [
{
"Subnet": "172.17.0.0/16",
"Gateway": "172.17.0.1"
}
]
},
"Internal": false,
"Containers": {
"3acef55e018280571410b63b0cb7314ba354b67fb6523662b48ad09be8424423": {
"Name": "syslog-ng",
"EndpointID": "d6f2ad9cc9b5f6a5030e6061c4abb600ff7b0f16711f169954dd446f1351cb08",
"MacAddress": "02:42:ac:11:00:03",
"IPv4Address": "172.17.0.3/16",
"IPv6Address": ""
},
"4f7d0101f97dca63b160e16a5e298c45f2ff51aa35085d0cdec96497a598be1a": {
"Name": "goofy_lamarr",
"EndpointID": "e357d6a99f67964bac4619d1ac984cd361a9c39137ea8d67a1ebc641e498919b",
"MacAddress": "02:42:ac:11:00:05",
"IPv4Address": "172.17.0.5/16",
"IPv6Address": ""
}
},
"Options": {
"com.docker.network.bridge.default_bridge": "true",
"com.docker.network.bridge.enable_icc": "true",
"com.docker.network.bridge.enable_ip_masquerade": "true",
"com.docker.network.bridge.host_binding_ipv4": "0.0.0.0",
"com.docker.network.bridge.name": "docker0",
"com.docker.network.driver.mtu": "1500"
},
"Labels": {}
}
]
This is /etc/hosts
on the ubuntu container where I try to log:
cat /etc/hosts
127.0.0.1 localhost
::1 localhost ip6-localhost ip6-loopback
fe00::0 ip6-localnet
ff00::0 ip6-mcastprefix
ff02::1 ip6-allnodes
ff02::2 ip6-allrouters
172.17.0.3 syslog-ng 3acef55e0182
172.17.0.5 4f7d0101f97d
So the syslog-ng should be available with syslog-ng or 172.17.0.3.
If I understood https://docs.docker.com/engine/userguide/networking/default_network/dockerlinks/ correctly, than linking should make it possible to log directly to syslog-ng
, and without the link, I should still be able to send messages from the one container to the container which exposed a port by ip, according to https://docs.docker.com/engine/userguide/networking/.
It seems like this is the same as: Logging from one docker container to another, but there are no concrete containers provided.
Has anyone an idea why this logging isn't possible?
Upvotes: 2
Views: 2201
Reputation: 71
It works. The problem was with the port number(515), with this command:
docker run -d -p 127.0.0.1:515:514/udp --name syslog-ng bobrik/syslog-ng
you say that the internal port 514 can be reached from the host with the 127.0.0.1:515. But if you want to reach the container directly from another container, you can reach it with syslog-ng:514 or with 172.17.0.2:514:
so the correct logger will be:
logger -n syslog-ng -P 514 test123345
I hope it helps
Br,
Micek
Upvotes: 2