Peter Gaultney
Peter Gaultney

Reputation: 3439

Split Spark dataframe string column into multiple columns

I've seen various people suggesting that Dataframe.explode is a useful way to do this, but it results in more rows than the original dataframe, which isn't what I want at all. I simply want to do the Dataframe equivalent of the very simple:

rdd.map(lambda row: row + [row.my_str_col.split('-')])

which takes something looking like:

col1 | my_str_col
-----+-----------
  18 |  856-yygrm
 201 |  777-psgdg

and converts it to this:

col1 | my_str_col | _col3 | _col4
-----+------------+-------+------
  18 |  856-yygrm |   856 | yygrm
 201 |  777-psgdg |   777 | psgdg

I am aware of pyspark.sql.functions.split(), but it results in a nested array column instead of two top-level columns like I want.

Ideally, I want these new columns to be named as well.

Upvotes: 114

Views: 274858

Answers (5)

ZygD
ZygD

Reputation: 24488

Instead of Column.getItem(i) we can use Column[i].
Also, enumerate is useful in big dataframes.

from pyspark.sql import functions as F
  • Keep parent column:

    for i, c in enumerate(['new_1', 'new_2']):
        df = df.withColumn(c, F.split('my_str_col', '-')[i])
    

    or

    new_cols = ['new_1', 'new_2']
    df = df.select('*', *[F.split('my_str_col', '-')[i].alias(c) for i, c in enumerate(new_cols)])
    
  • Replace parent column:

    for i, c in enumerate(['new_1', 'new_2']):
        df = df.withColumn(c, F.split('my_str_col', '-')[i])
    df = df.drop('my_str_col')
    

    or

    new_cols = ['new_1', 'new_2']
    df = df.select(
        *[c for c in df.columns if c != 'my_str_col'],
        *[F.split('my_str_col', '-')[i].alias(c) for i, c in enumerate(new_cols)]
    )
    

Upvotes: 4

cgapperi
cgapperi

Reputation: 186

I understand your pain. Using split() can work, but can also lead to breaks.

Let's take your df and make a slight change to it:

df = spark.createDataFrame([('1:"a:3":2001',),('2:"b":2002',),('3:"c":2003',)],["value"]) 

df.show()

+------------+
|       value|
+------------+
|1:"a:3":2001|
|  2:"b":2002|
|  3:"c":2003|
+------------+

If you try to apply split() to this as outlined above:

df_split = df.select(split(df.value,":")).rdd.flatMap(
              lambda x: x).toDF(schema=["col1","col2","col3"]).show()

you will get

IllegalStateException: Input row doesn't have expected number of values required by the schema. 4 fields are required while 3 values are provided.

So, is there a more elegant way of addressing this? I was so happy to have it pointed out to me. pyspark.sql.functions.from_csv() is your friend.

Taking my above example df:

from pyspark.sql.functions import from_csv

# Define a column schema to apply with from_csv()
col_schema = ["col1 INTEGER","col2 STRING","col3 INTEGER"]
schema_str = ",".join(col_schema)

# define the separator because it isn't a ','
options = {'sep': ":"}

# create a df from the value column using schema and options
df_csv = df.select(from_csv(df.value, schema_str, options).alias("value_parsed"))
df_csv.show()

+--------------+
|  value_parsed|
+--------------+
|[1, a:3, 2001]|
|  [2, b, 2002]|
|  [3, c, 2003]|
+--------------+

Then we can easily flatten the df to put the values in columns:

df2 = df_csv.select("value_parsed.*").toDF("col1","col2","col3")
df2.show()

+----+----+----+
|col1|col2|col3|
+----+----+----+
|   1| a:3|2001|
|   2|   b|2002|
|   3|   c|2003|
+----+----+----+

No breaks. Data correctly parsed. Life is good. Have a beer.

Upvotes: 2

Luca Soato
Luca Soato

Reputation: 385

Here's another approach, in case you want split a string with a delimiter.

import pyspark.sql.functions as f

df = spark.createDataFrame([("1:a:2001",),("2:b:2002",),("3:c:2003",)],["value"])
df.show()
+--------+
|   value|
+--------+
|1:a:2001|
|2:b:2002|
|3:c:2003|
+--------+

df_split = df.select(f.split(df.value,":")).rdd.flatMap(
              lambda x: x).toDF(schema=["col1","col2","col3"])

df_split.show()
+----+----+----+
|col1|col2|col3|
+----+----+----+
|   1|   a|2001|
|   2|   b|2002|
|   3|   c|2003|
+----+----+----+

I don't think this transition back and forth to RDDs is going to slow you down... Also don't worry about last schema specification: it's optional, you can avoid it generalizing the solution to data with unknown column size.

Upvotes: 23

pault
pault

Reputation: 43544

Here's a solution to the general case that doesn't involve needing to know the length of the array ahead of time, using collect, or using udfs. Unfortunately this only works for spark version 2.1 and above, because it requires the posexplode function.

Suppose you had the following DataFrame:

df = spark.createDataFrame(
    [
        [1, 'A, B, C, D'], 
        [2, 'E, F, G'], 
        [3, 'H, I'], 
        [4, 'J']
    ]
    , ["num", "letters"]
)
df.show()
#+---+----------+
#|num|   letters|
#+---+----------+
#|  1|A, B, C, D|
#|  2|   E, F, G|
#|  3|      H, I|
#|  4|         J|
#+---+----------+

Split the letters column and then use posexplode to explode the resultant array along with the position in the array. Next use pyspark.sql.functions.expr to grab the element at index pos in this array.

import pyspark.sql.functions as f

df.select(
        "num",
        f.split("letters", ", ").alias("letters"),
        f.posexplode(f.split("letters", ", ")).alias("pos", "val")
    )\
    .show()
#+---+------------+---+---+
#|num|     letters|pos|val|
#+---+------------+---+---+
#|  1|[A, B, C, D]|  0|  A|
#|  1|[A, B, C, D]|  1|  B|
#|  1|[A, B, C, D]|  2|  C|
#|  1|[A, B, C, D]|  3|  D|
#|  2|   [E, F, G]|  0|  E|
#|  2|   [E, F, G]|  1|  F|
#|  2|   [E, F, G]|  2|  G|
#|  3|      [H, I]|  0|  H|
#|  3|      [H, I]|  1|  I|
#|  4|         [J]|  0|  J|
#+---+------------+---+---+

Now we create two new columns from this result. First one is the name of our new column, which will be a concatenation of letter and the index in the array. The second column will be the value at the corresponding index in the array. We get the latter by exploiting the functionality of pyspark.sql.functions.expr which allows us use column values as parameters.

df.select(
        "num",
        f.split("letters", ", ").alias("letters"),
        f.posexplode(f.split("letters", ", ")).alias("pos", "val")
    )\
    .drop("val")\
    .select(
        "num",
        f.concat(f.lit("letter"),f.col("pos").cast("string")).alias("name"),
        f.expr("letters[pos]").alias("val")
    )\
    .show()
#+---+-------+---+
#|num|   name|val|
#+---+-------+---+
#|  1|letter0|  A|
#|  1|letter1|  B|
#|  1|letter2|  C|
#|  1|letter3|  D|
#|  2|letter0|  E|
#|  2|letter1|  F|
#|  2|letter2|  G|
#|  3|letter0|  H|
#|  3|letter1|  I|
#|  4|letter0|  J|
#+---+-------+---+

Now we can just groupBy the num and pivot the DataFrame. Putting that all together, we get:

df.select(
        "num",
        f.split("letters", ", ").alias("letters"),
        f.posexplode(f.split("letters", ", ")).alias("pos", "val")
    )\
    .drop("val")\
    .select(
        "num",
        f.concat(f.lit("letter"),f.col("pos").cast("string")).alias("name"),
        f.expr("letters[pos]").alias("val")
    )\
    .groupBy("num").pivot("name").agg(f.first("val"))\
    .show()
#+---+-------+-------+-------+-------+
#|num|letter0|letter1|letter2|letter3|
#+---+-------+-------+-------+-------+
#|  1|      A|      B|      C|      D|
#|  3|      H|      I|   null|   null|
#|  2|      E|      F|      G|   null|
#|  4|      J|   null|   null|   null|
#+---+-------+-------+-------+-------+

Upvotes: 58

Peter Gaultney
Peter Gaultney

Reputation: 3439

pyspark.sql.functions.split() is the right approach here - you simply need to flatten the nested ArrayType column into multiple top-level columns. In this case, where each array only contains 2 items, it's very easy. You simply use Column.getItem() to retrieve each part of the array as a column itself:

split_col = pyspark.sql.functions.split(df['my_str_col'], '-')
df = df.withColumn('NAME1', split_col.getItem(0))
df = df.withColumn('NAME2', split_col.getItem(1))

The result will be:

col1 | my_str_col | NAME1 | NAME2
-----+------------+-------+------
  18 |  856-yygrm |   856 | yygrm
 201 |  777-psgdg |   777 | psgdg

I am not sure how I would solve this in a general case where the nested arrays were not the same size from Row to Row.

Upvotes: 172

Related Questions