Reputation: 8111
Original Title: When PRIMARY KEY and foreign key INDEX are set on the same column names, does that mean that same index is duplicated?
Example:
I've generated a table using MySQL Workbench, and using Identifying relationship to other tables. That means that PRIMARY KEY contains FOREIGN KEY columns in my case.
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `price_history` (
`amount` DECIMAL NULL,
`date_start` DATE NULL,
`date_end` DATE NULL,
`product_id` INT NOT NULL,
`category_id` INT NOT NULL,
`priceitem_id` INT NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (`product_id`, `category_id`, `priceitem_id`),
INDEX `fk_idx` (`product_id` ASC, `category_id` ASC, `priceitem_id` ASC),
ENGINE = InnoDB;
I note that PRIMARY KEY
and INDEX
define the same columns. Does that mean I will have two separate "physical" indices on the table? Won't that be wasteful?
I am wondering if it a necessary evil of identifying relationships.
Upvotes: 0
Views: 147
Reputation: 24960
I don't see this happening if I understand your question. In the below, price_history
does not have a db engine auto-created index that duplicates.
create table A
( `product_id` INT NOT NULL,
`category_id` INT NOT NULL,
`priceitem_id` INT NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (`product_id`, `category_id`, `priceitem_id`)
)ENGINE=INNODB;
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `price_history` (
`amount` DECIMAL NULL,
`date_start` DATE NULL,
`date_end` DATE NULL,
`product_id` INT NOT NULL,
`category_id` INT NOT NULL,
`priceitem_id` INT NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (`product_id`, `category_id`, `priceitem_id`),
FOREIGN KEY `f` (`product_id`, `category_id`, `priceitem_id`) references A(`product_id`, `category_id`, `priceitem_id`)
)ENGINE = InnoDB;
show create table price_history;
CREATE TABLE `price_history` (
`amount` decimal(10,0) DEFAULT NULL,
`date_start` date DEFAULT NULL,
`date_end` date DEFAULT NULL,
`product_id` int(11) NOT NULL,
`category_id` int(11) NOT NULL,
`priceitem_id` int(11) NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (`product_id`,`category_id`,`priceitem_id`),
CONSTRAINT `price_history_ibfk_1` FOREIGN KEY (`product_id`, `category_id`, `priceitem_id`)
REFERENCES `a` (`product_id`, `category_id`, `priceitem_id`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB;
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `price_history` (
`amount` DECIMAL NULL,
`date_start` DATE NULL,
`date_end` DATE NULL,
`product_id` INT NOT NULL,
`category_id` INT NOT NULL,
`priceitem_id` INT NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (`product_id`, `category_id`, `priceitem_id`),
FOREIGN KEY `f` (`product_id`, `category_id`, `priceitem_id`) references A(`product_id`, `category_id`, `priceitem_id`)
)ENGINE = InnoDB;
show create table A;
CREATE TABLE `a` (
`product_id` int(11) NOT NULL,
`category_id` int(11) NOT NULL,
`priceitem_id` int(11) NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (`product_id`,`category_id`,`priceitem_id`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB;
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `price_historyBBB` (
id int auto_increment primary key,
`amount` DECIMAL NULL,
`date_start` DATE NULL,
`date_end` DATE NULL,
`product_id` INT NOT NULL,
`category_id` INT NOT NULL,
`priceitem_id` INT NOT NULL,
FOREIGN KEY `g` (`product_id`, `category_id`, `priceitem_id`) references A(`product_id`, `category_id`, `priceitem_id`)
)ENGINE = InnoDB;
show create table price_historyBBB;
CREATE TABLE `price_historybbb` (
`id` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
`amount` decimal(10,0) DEFAULT NULL,
`date_start` date DEFAULT NULL,
`date_end` date DEFAULT NULL,
`product_id` int(11) NOT NULL,
`category_id` int(11) NOT NULL,
`priceitem_id` int(11) NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (`id`),
KEY `g` (`product_id`,`category_id`,`priceitem_id`),
CONSTRAINT `price_historybbb_ibfk_1` FOREIGN KEY (`product_id`, `category_id`, `priceitem_id`)
REFERENCES `a` (`product_id`, `category_id`, `priceitem_id`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB;
show indexes from price_history;
show indexes from price_historyBBB;
So, if there exists an adequate key (say, composite) left-most chunk adequate enough for re-use, then the db engine will not auto-create a Helper index.
For instance, if you had a key (PK or otherwise) that was a composite of (col1,col2,col3,col5) and your FK called for the use of (col1,col2), then a new index is not auto-gen'd.
If the need for the FK was for (colX,col1,col2) then the above (col1,col2,col3,col5) is not useful (left-most priority) and the db engine will need to create an FK helper index.
Upvotes: 1