CODEWITHSUNDEEP
javaspringjms
Iker Jimenez
Iker Jimenez

Reputation: 7245

Fastest way to process JMS messages from Spring-JMS

I have a JMS queue with a gazillion messages to be processed. I'm going to have a good few listeners that I'm implementing using spring-jms to read from this queue.

I'm getting a bit lost on the different ListenerContainers and their possible configurations. My requirements are:

Anybody has a suggestion on the ListenerContainer to use and a configuration in terms of number of JMS sessions, threads, etc.

Machine would have 8 cores, plenty of RAM.

Upvotes: 4

Views: 2167

Answers (2)

jcalvert
jcalvert

Reputation: 3736

I would look into using Spring Integration. It makes setting up JMS based applications really easy. 

    <bean id="commandQueue" class="org.apache.activemq.command.ActiveMQQueue">
            <constructor-arg value="queue.command"/>
    </bean>

    <jms:message-driven-channel-adapter
    id="jmsin" destination="commandQueue" channel="commandChannel" />

    <int:channel id="commandChannel" />

So in the XML chunk above, you create a "channel" which is an abstract queue concept. You define your JMS queue as normal, and then you just define an adapter.

    <service-activator input-channel="commandChannel" 
           ref="commandWatcher" method="processCommand">
    <poller task-executor="pool">
        <interval-trigger interval="100"/>
    </poller>
</service-activator>

<bean id="commandWatcher" class="foo.bar.Pojo" scope="prototype"/>

    <bean id="pool" class="org.springframework.scheduling.concurrent.ThreadPoolTaskExecutor">
 <property name="corePoolSize" value="8" />   
     </beans:bean>

So, the code above just defines a 'service activator', which means that every 100ms, it's looking to see if there are messages on the queue. It then pulls that message and processes it on a threadpool by passing the message to a POJO. You define a simple method and it can take the payload as a String, or if you have it as a Serialized object, you can have it be that. If you need more semantics like headers, you can use annotations and get the headers as a Map.

This makes the JMS stuff about as painless as it gets...

Upvotes: 1

skaffman
skaffman

Reputation: 403551

Unless you have a specific reason to do otherwise, you should use DefaultMessageListenerContainer. This is the most flexible in terms of performance and configuration. In contrast, SimpleMessageListenerContainer is a bit too simple to be of practical use.

I can't advise you on the number of concurrent consumers to set up, since that depends entirely on your setup.

Upvotes: 4

Related Questions