Reputation: 3850
Using docker-compose, I'm trying to run my API on a publicly available port 8080 and an sqs service on a privately available port 9324. The API needs to be able to communicate with the sqs service. In order to do so, I have set up the following docker-compose.yml:
version: '2'
services:
api:
image: api
ports:
- "8080:8080"
sqs:
image: pakohan/elasticmq
I have tried several iterations, including adding a link alias for the api:
links:
- "sqs:localhost"
and exposing the port for sqs:
ports:
- "9324:9324"
but neither seems to work. The API always gets a connection refused error when trying to communicate with the sqs service.
When the sqs port is publicly exposed an API running outside of docker is able to communicate just fine (so the sqs service is getting initialized properly).
Does anyone have any ideas as to how to solve this problem?
Upvotes: 14
Views: 30451
Reputation: 729
Please note that links
is a legacy feature of Docker now (see Docs).
When you declare multiple services within a single docker-compose
file, they will actually be inside the same network (be it the default one or a user-defined one). The trick then is to use the name of your service rather than localhost. With your original example then:
version: '2'
services:
api:
image: api
ports:
- "8080:8080"
sqs:
image: pakohan/elasticmq
You simply need to make sure you're accessing sqs
rather than localhost
(your hostname for the sqs service should literally be: sqs
)
Upvotes: 16
Reputation: 57630
Trying to trick the api
container into connecting to sqs
by telling it that it's actually connecting to localhost
isn't going to work. You need to make sqs
available to api
under a name that doesn't already have a special meaning, like:
links:
- sqs:original-name
or even:
links:
- sqs
which makes sqs
accessible to api
under the name "sqs
".
Then, of course, you need to tell api
that it should connect to port 9324 of original-name
or sqs
instead of port 9324 of localhost
. How you do that depends on what api
actually is.
Upvotes: 9