Reputation: 2629
Class to be tested
public class ClassUnderTest {
public void functionA() {
functionB();
functionC();
}
private void functionB() {
}
private void functionC() {
}
}
Test Class
@RunWith(PowerMockRunner.class)
public class TestClass {
@Test
public void testFunctionA() throws Exception {
ClassUnderTest classUnderTest = PowerMockito.spy(new ClassUnderTest());
classUnderTest.functionA();
PowerMockito.verifyPrivate(classUnderTest).invoke("functionB");
PowerMockito.verifyPrivate(classUnderTest).invoke("functionC");
}
}
While executing the test class I'm getting the following error,
org.mockito.exceptions.misusing.UnfinishedVerificationException:
Missing method call for verify(mock) here:
-> at org.powermock.api.mockito.PowerMockito.verifyPrivate(PowerMockito.java:312)
Example of correct verification:
verify(mock).doSomething()
Also, this error might show up because you verify either of: final/private/equals()/hashCode() methods.
Those methods *cannot* be stubbed/verified.
Mocking methods declared on non-public parent classes is not supported.
If one verification is commented then the test case works fine.
Upvotes: 2
Views: 2326
Reputation: 1
You can try adding two lines of code
@RunWith(PowerMockRunner.class)
public class TestClass {
@Test
public void testFunctionA() throws Exception {
ClassUnderTest classUnderTest = PowerMockito.spy(new ClassUnderTest());
PowerMockito.doNothing().when(classUnderTest, "functionB");
PowerMockito.doNothing().when(classUnderTest, "functionC");
classUnderTest.functionA();
PowerMockito.verifyPrivate(classUnderTest).invoke("functionB");
PowerMockito.verifyPrivate(classUnderTest).invoke("functionC");
}
}
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 140523
Another idea: don't do that. Do not verify private methods. Those methods are private for a reason. You should really try to avoid to write tests that have to know that some private method was called.
You see, the idea of private is: it is subject to change. A good unit test works with observing the behavior of your class - you call public methods with different arguments; and you check the results coming back. Or maybe, you use dependency injection to provide mocked objects to your test class - when your test code needs those other methods to do its job.
But you should really not start checking private methods. The point is: those private methods should do something that is observable from the outside. Either they work on the final "return" value; or they change some internal state that might be checked in other ways. In other words: if those private methods do not cause any other effect on your class under test - what would be their purpose anyway?!
Upvotes: -1
Reputation: 3087
You have to add ClassUnderTest in PrepareForTest.
@RunWith(PowerMockRunner.class)
@PrepareForTest(ClassUnderTest.class)
public class TestClass {
@Test
public void testFunctionA() throws Exception {
ClassUnderTest classUnderTest = PowerMockito.spy(new ClassUnderTest());
classUnderTest.functionA();
PowerMockito.verifyPrivate(classUnderTest).invoke("functionB");
PowerMockito.verifyPrivate(classUnderTest).invoke("functionC");
}
I have just added sysouts in private methods & run the test class.
Upvotes: 3