Reputation: 1308
I have a list that contains only integers, and I want to check if all the numbers in the list are consecutive (the order of the numbers does not matter).
If there are repeated elements, the function should return False.
Here is my attempt to solve this:
def isconsecutive(lst):
"""
Returns True if all numbers in lst can be ordered consecutively, and False otherwise
"""
if len(set(lst)) == len(lst) and max(lst) - min(lst) == len(lst) - 1:
return True
else:
return False
For example:
l = [-2,-3,-1,0,1,3,2,5,4]
print(isconsecutive(l))
True
Is this the best way to do this?
Upvotes: 3
Views: 3780
Reputation: 180391
A better approach in terms of how many times you look at the elements would be to incorporate finding the min, max and short circuiting on any dupe all in one pass, although would probably be beaten by the speed of the builtin functions depending on the inputs:
def mn_mx(l):
mn, mx = float("inf"), float("-inf")
seen = set()
for ele in l:
# if we already saw the ele, end the function
if ele in seen:
return False, False
if ele < mn:
mn = ele
if ele > mx:
mx = ele
seen.add(ele)
return mn, mx
def isconsecutive(lst):
"""
Returns True if all numbers in lst can be ordered consecutively, and False otherwise
"""
mn, mx = mn_mx(lst)
# could check either, if mn is False we found a dupe
if mn is False:
return False
# if we get here there are no dupes
return mx - mn == len(lst) - 1
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 15423
Here is another solution:
def is_consecutive(l):
setl = set(l)
return len(l) == len(setl) and setl == set(range(min(l), max(l)+1))
However, your solution is probably better as you don't store the whole range in memory.
Note that you can always simplify
if boolean_expression:
return True
else:
return False
by
return boolean_expression
Upvotes: 4