Reputation: 8048
First off, I've been using this code as a reference, which shows the use of MPI_Gather
without MPI_Scatter
as that is what I am trying to achieve here. I've been working on this for a long time now and just can't figure out the issue. This sobel edge detection algorithm strengthens the outlines of objects inside images.
I will post my code below, as there is not too much, but I'll give a quick code description first.
I am trying to convert a sequential program into a parallel program. So all the non-MPI code is correct.
So there can only be a mistake with my MPI
code somewhere.
int main(int argc, char **argv) {
FILE *inFile, *oFile;
int grayImage[N][N], edgeImage[N][N];
char type[2];
int w, h, max;
int r, g, b, y, x, i, j, sum, sumx, sumy;
int tid;
int GX[3][3], GY[3][3];
double elapsed_time;
struct timeval tv1, tv2;
int error = 0;
char buffer[BUFSIZ];
int rank, NP;
// Code lies here for reading from the image file and storing into the grayImage array.
// This works so I saw no reason to include it
/* 3x3 Sobel masks. */
GX[0][0] = -1; GX[0][1] = 0; GX[0][2] = 1;
GX[1][0] = -2; GX[1][1] = 0; GX[1][2] = 2;
GX[2][0] = -1; GX[2][1] = 0; GX[2][2] = 1;
GY[0][0] = 1; GY[0][1] = 2; GY[0][2] = 1;
GY[1][0] = 0; GY[1][1] = 0; GY[1][2] = 0;
GY[2][0] = -1; GY[2][1] = -2; GY[2][2] = -1;
MPI_Init(NULL, NULL);
MPI_Comm_size(MPI_COMM_WORLD, &NP);
MPI_Comm_rank(MPI_COMM_WORLD, &rank);
// This calculates the block size.MPI
// On 4 processors the block size for a 100x100 image would be 25x100 each
int blksz = (int)ceil((double)N/NP);
// This creates a local array for each processor, soon to be gathered
int tempEdge[blksz][N];
// this line shows it's working correctly
printf("processor %d, width: %d, height: %d, blksz: %d, begin: %d, end: %d\n", rank, w, h, blksz, rank*blksz, (rank+1)*blksz);
for(x=rank*blksz; x < (rank+1)*blksz && x<h; x++){
// Any code in this loop can be ignored as it works correctly.
for(y=0; y < w; ++y){
sumx = 0;
sumy = 0;
// handle image boundaries
if(x==0 || x==(h-1) || y==0 || y==(w-1))
sum = 0;
else{
//x gradient approx
for(i=-1; i<=1; i++) {
for(j=-1; j<=1; j++){
sumx += (grayImage[x+i][y+j] * GX[i+1][j+1]);
}
}
//y gradient approx
for(i=-1; i<=1; i++) {
for(j=-1; j<=1; j++){
sumy += (grayImage[x+i][y+j] * GY[i+1][j+1]);
}
}
//gradient magnitude approx
sum = (abs(sumx) + abs(sumy));
}
tempEdge[x][y] = clamp(sum);
}
}
// Here is the line I am guessing is causing the problem
MPI_Gather(&tempEdge, w*blksz, MPI_INT,
&edgeImage, w*blksz, MPI_INT, 0,
MPI_COMM_WORLD);
// Finally, I output edgeImage to a file here.
if(rank==0){
// output edgeImage to File
}
MPI_Finalize();
return 0;
}
The input image I am using is this:
But the output is only giving this:
As you can see it is only the top quarter (N/4), or blksz
of the image.
This would imply that MPI_Gather
is only gathering from process with rank 0?
I've been spending so much time on this, any help would be hugely appreciated!
Upvotes: 0
Views: 1013
Reputation: 74355
Do not blame MPI collectives for bugs in the rest of your code. It is actually a miracle that your code produces broken images without segfaulting. Just take a look at that part:
int tempEdge[blksz][N];
~~~~~
for(x = rank*blksz; x < (rank+1)*blksz && x<h; x++){
~~~~~~~~~~
for(y = 0; y < w; ++y){
...
tempEdge[x][y] = clamp(sum); (1)
~
}
}
For any rank > 0 the code writes past the end of the array. Fix the statement at (1) to read:
tempEdge[x - rank*blksz][y] = clamp(sum);
Also, remove the &
s in the MPI_Gather
call:
MPI_Gather(tempEdge, w*blksz, MPI_INT,
edgeImage, w*blksz, MPI_INT, 0,
MPI_COMM_WORLD);
It will work with &
too, but that is technically incorrect. If you insist on using the address-of operator, then use &tempEdge[0][0]
and &edgeImage[0][0]
instead.
Upvotes: 3