stef
stef

Reputation: 27789

Custom sorting a flat array with uasort() returns 1

An array arrives with some or all of the following values, in any order. What's the best way to order them in ascending size order? So starting with small and ending with XXL. I can usort but am a bit lost as to how the elements should be ordered in my user defined function

Small
XXL
Medium
Large 
XL

EDIT: left out some info so created new question Custom ordering array with key / value pairs

EDIT2: Full code

print_r($sizes);
$sorted_sizes = $this->sort_sizes(array_unique($sizes));
print_r($sorted_sizes);

function sort_sizes($sizes)
{
    return uasort($sizes, array($this, 'cmp'));
}

function cmp($a,$b)
{
    $sizeArray = array( 'Small' => 0, 'Medium' => 1, 'Large' => 2, 'XL' => 3, 'XXL' => 4); 
    return $sizeArray[$a] - $sizeArray[$b];
}

This outputs:

Array
(
    [66-507cddcd16d9786abafccfa78b19acf8] => XL
    [64-507cddcd16d9786abafccfa78b19acf8] => medium
    [65-507cddcd16d9786abafccfa78b19acf8] => large
    [63-507cddcd16d9786abafccfa78b19acf8] => small
)

and print_r($sorted_sizes) just gives output "1"

Upvotes: 1

Views: 3678

Answers (4)

mickmackusa
mickmackusa

Reputation: 48031

It is suboptimal to use uasort() for this task because performing the data preparation to facilitate the comparisons will unnecessarily increase the time complexity and overhead. Instead, use array_multisort() after preparing an array of priority values. array_multisort() will preserve your non-numeric associative keys.

Your $sizeArray has hardcoded integers as values which will cause more lines to be modified if you ever want a new size in the middle of your array. Instead, write the size words as values and flip them at run time.

Code: Demo

$map = array_flip([
    'small',
    'medium',
    'large',
    'xl',
    'xxl',
]); 
    
array_multisort(
    array_map(
        fn($v) => $map[strtolower($v)] ?? PHP_INT_MAX, 
        $array
    ),
    $array
);
var_export($array);

Upvotes: 0

BoltClock
BoltClock

Reputation: 724342

Updated answer according to full code

The first issue here is that you're returning the result of uasort():

function sort_sizes($sizes)
{
    return uasort($sizes, array($this, 'cmp'));
}

That's wrong, because uasort() does not return the sorted array. It modifies the same variable that you pass as a parameter, and returns a boolean value. That's why you see 1 as output.

Make the method accept $sizes by reference:

function sort_sizes(array &$sizes)
{
    uasort($sizes, array($this, 'cmp'));
}

Then call it like so:

print_r($sizes);
$sorted_sizes = array_unique($sizes);
$this->sort_sizes($sorted_sizes);
print_r($sorted_sizes);

Here's your cmp() method, with added support for case-insensitive sorting:

function cmp($a, $b)
{
    $sizes = array('small' => 0, 'medium' => 1, 'large' => 2, 'xl' => 3, 'xxl' => 4);
    return $sizes[strtolower($a)] - $sizes[strtolower($b)];
}

Old answer

Try this. Use uasort() instead if you want to maintain key-value pairs:

function sort_sizes($a, $b) {
    // Map the sizes to an ordered sequence of ints
    static $sizes = array('small' => 0, 'medium' => 1, 'large' => 2, 'xl' => 3, 'xxl' => 4);

    // Find the difference, using the sizes as keys to the above array
    return $sizes[strtolower($a)] - $sizes[strtolower($b)];
}

$arr = array('Small', 'XXL', 'Medium', 'Large', 'XL');

print_r($arr); // Before sorting
uasort($arr, 'sort_sizes');
print_r($arr); // After sorting

Output:

Array
(
    [0] => Small
    [1] => XXL
    [2] => Medium
    [3] => Large
    [4] => XL
)
Array
(
    [0] => Small
    [2] => Medium
    [3] => Large
    [4] => XL
    [1] => XXL
)

Upvotes: 6

Gumbo
Gumbo

Reputation: 655649

You can do this using array_multisort:

$orderIndex = array_flip(array('Small','Medium','Large','XL','XXL'));
$arr = array('Small','XXL','Medium','Large','XL');
array_multisort(array_map(function($val) use ($orderIndex) { return $orderIndex[$val]; }, $arr), $arr);

Here array_map is used with an anonymous function to build an array of the “weight” of each value in $arr. That array is then used to order the values in $arr.

This is basically the same as BoltClock suggested just with doing the comparison on the already calculated “weights”.

Upvotes: 3

xPheRe
xPheRe

Reputation: 2343

Do the sorting in two phases. First, convert text to a convenient numeric value. In this moment you should decide if "L" and "Large" map to the same value or not. Then reorder the array based on those numeric conversions.

Upvotes: 1

Related Questions