Reputation: 119
I wanted to follow the guidelines of Rob Pikes and store integers to disk without bothering about endianess. So, here's my test code:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <inttypes.h>
#include <string.h>
typedef uint8_t byte;
uint32_t _wireto32(byte *data) {
uint32_t i =
((uint32_t)data[3]<<0) |
((uint32_t)data[2]<<8) |
((uint32_t)data[1]<<16) |
((uint32_t)data[0]<<24);
return i;
}
void _32towire(uint32_t i, byte *data) {
data[0] = (i >> 24) & 0xFF;
data[1] = (i >> 16) & 0xFF;
data[2] = (i >> 8) & 0xFF;
data[3] = i & 0xFF;
}
void _dump(char *n, byte *d, size_t s, uint64_t N) {
int l = strlen(n) + 9;
fprintf(stderr, "%s (len: %ld, Num: %ld): ", n, s, N);
size_t i;
int c;
for (i=0; i<s; ++i) {
fprintf(stderr, "%02x", d[i]);
if(i % 36 == 35 && i > 0) {
fprintf(stderr, "\n");
for(c=0; c<l; ++c)
fprintf(stderr, " ");
}
}
fprintf(stderr, "\n");
}
int main(int argc, char **argv) {
FILE *fd = NULL;
uint32_t n_orig = 20160809;
uint8_t b[4];
uint32_t n_new;
if(argc != 2) {
fprintf(stderr, "Usage: util w|r\n");
exit(1);
}
switch(argv[1][0]) {
case 'w':
if((fd = fopen("buffer.b", "wb+")) == NULL) {
perror("unable to write buffer.b");
return 1;
}
_32towire(n_orig, b);
fwrite(b, 4, 1, fd);
close(fd);
_dump("out", b, 4, n_orig);
break;
case 'r':
if((fd = fopen("buffer.b", "rb+")) == NULL) {
perror("unable to open read buffer.b");
return 1;
}
if((fread(b, 1, 4, fd)) <=0) {
perror("unable to read from buffer.b");
return 1;
}
close(fd);
n_new = _wireto32(b);
_dump(" in", b, 4, n_new);
}
return 0;
}
When I run this on a x86 system, everything looks fine:
% ./util w && ./util r
out (len: 4, Num: 20160809): 0133a129
in (len: 4, Num: 20160809): 0133a129
Now if I transfer the output file to an big-endian system (aix on powerpc in my case), I get:
./util r
in (len: 4, Num: 0): 0133a129
So, I'm obviously overlooking something. Does anyone have an idea?
Thanks, Tom
Upvotes: 1
Views: 1056
Reputation: 2999
Although you have a mistake among fclose()
and close()
at:
$ gcc tst.c -otst
tst.c: In function ‘main’:
tst.c:61:7: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘close’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
close(fd);
^
It works fine in AIX compiling with GCC v4.8.3, even with this mistake and warning. Maybe this version of gcc knows how to deal with casting from uint32_t
to uint64_t
.
$ ./tst w
out (len: 4, Num: 0): 0133a129
$ ./tst r
in (len: 4, Num: 0): 0133a129
Just for knowledge, try an explicit cast in:
_dump(" in", b, 4, n_new);
_dump(" in", b, 4, (uint64_t)n_new);
But, your _dump()
function could be fixed to receive the compatible type:
void _dump(char *n, byte *d, size_t s, uint32_t N) {
...
}
Just to show the powerpc (AIX) when I tested:
To show the endianess:
#include <stdio.h>
int main() {
int n = 0x01;
if ( ((char*)(&n))[0] == 1 && ((char*)(&n))[sizeof(n) - 1] == 0) {
printf("This is a litte-endian plataform\n");
} else if ( ((char*)(&n))[0] == 0 && ((char*)(&n))[sizeof(n) - 1] == 1) {
printf("This is a big-endian plataform\n");
} else {
printf("Couldn't determine the endianess of this plataform\n");
}
}
Running:
$ ./endianess
This is a big-endian plataform
$ uname -a
AIX ???? 1 7 ???????????? powerpc AIX
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 1910
gcc -maix32 says:
tom.c:27:3: warning: format '%ld' expects argument of type 'long int',
but argument 5 has type 'uint64_t' [-Wformat=]
fprintf(stderr, "%s (len: %ld, Num: %ld): ", n, s, N);
so do this:
fprintf(stderr, "%s (len: %ld, Num: %ld): ", n, s, (long)N);
When compiling always use this flags: -W -Wextra -Werror -pedantic
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 213989
If you wonder why the big endian system prints Num: 0
, then that's because of your _dump
function taking uint64_t N
and not 32 bits. On a big endian machine, the 4 most significant bytes are 0.
Upvotes: 2