Reputation: 1347
I'm guessing because you save resources by making 1 request instead of 2 to the database. Is this significant? Should I care to use populate if I'm populating only 1 field (the advantage is clearer when you populate more than 1)?
Upvotes: 0
Views: 103
Reputation: 4619
You don't save resources by using populate. Under the hood mongoose calls the database as many times as required. Consider the example:
module.exports = function(){
var UserSchema = new Schema({
email : {type : String, required: true},
password: {type: String, required: true}
});
return mongoose.model("User", UserSchema);
};
module.exports = function(){
var AccountSchema = new Schema({
number : {type : String, required: true},
user: {type: Schema.Types.ObjectId, ref: 'User'}
});
return mongoose.model("Account", AccountSchema);
};
mongoose.set('debug', true); //to see queries mongoose is using behind the scenes
Account.find({}, function(err, res){
console.log(res)
}).populate("user")
Apart from the results, you'll see something like this on console:
Mongoose: accounts.find({}, { fields: undefined })
Mongoose: users.find({ _id: { '$in': [ ObjectId("5807d6d6aa66d7633a5d7025"), ObjectId("5807d6d6aa66d7633a5d7026"), ObjectId("5807d709aa66d7633a5d7027") ] } }, { fields: undefined })
That's mongoose finding account documents and then user for each one of them.
It's saving you a lot of code and I don't see why you should not use it irrespective of the number of fields you're populating.
Upvotes: 1