Reputation: 13
I am learning c++ from Programming: Principles and Practice Using C++ / Edition 2 and I've run into a problem with vectors. I'm using the included header file provided from Stroustrup's book here. When I compile the following vector program, I get an error.
#include "std_lib_facilities.h"
int main()
{
vector<int> v = {5, 7, 9, 4, 6, 8};
for (int i=0; i<v.size(); ++i)
cout << v[i] << endl;
}
Error
vector.cpp:5:21 error: no matching constructor for initialization of 'Vector<int>'
vector<int> v = {5, 7, 9, 4, 6, 8};
^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./std_lib_facilities.h:82:5: note: candidate constructor template not viable:
requires 2 arguments, but 6 were provided
Vector(I first, I last) :std::vector<T>(first, last) {}
^
./std_lib_facilities.h:79:14: note: candidate constructor not viable: requires 2
arguments but 6 were provided
Vector(size_type n, const T& v) :std::vector<T>(n,v) {}
^
./std_lib_facilities.h:79:14: note: candidate constructor not viable: requires
single argument 'n', but 6 arguments were provided
explicit Vector(size_type n) :std::vector<T>(n) {}
./std_lib_facilities.h:75:27: note: candidate constructor (the implicit move
constructor) not viable: requires 1 argument, but 6 were provided
template< class T> struct Vector : public std::vector<T> {
^
./std_lib_facilities.h:75:27: note: candidate constructor (the implicit copy
constructor) not viable: requires 1 argument but 6 were provided
./std_lib_facilities.h:78:5: note: candidate constructor not viable: requires 0
arguments, but 6 were provided
Vector() { }
^
I'm compiling with: clang++ -std=c++11 -stdlib=libc++ vector.cpp
When I check my version of Clang, I get:
Apple LLVM Version 8.0.0 (clang-800.0.42.1)
Target: x86_64-apple-darwin16.1.0
Thread model: posse
InstalledDir: /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/bin
I am having trouble making sense of the error and warnings and not sure where to go from here. Thank you for any insight you may provide.
Upvotes: 1
Views: 1903
Reputation: 1
The linked header file has the line:
#define vector Vector
which means when you write vector<int>
the compiler sees Vector<int>
, which is his own implementation of a vector. I didn't see a constructor that builds an instance from a hard-coded array like you are trying to do.
If you include the actual standard library, it should work since you are compiling in C++11 (see here). Though that vector won't have the range checking added in the linked header file.
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 16431
std_lib_facilities.h
defines class Vector<T>
as:
template< class T> struct Vector : public std::vector<T> {
typedef typename std::vector<T>::size_type size_type;
Vector() { }
explicit Vector(size_type n) :std::vector<T>(n) {}
Vector(size_type n, const T& v) :std::vector<T>(n,v) {}
template <class I>
Vector(I first, I last) :std::vector<T>(first,last) {}
T& operator[](unsigned int i) // rather than return at(i);
{
if (i<0||this->size()<=i) throw Range_error(i);
return std::vector<T>::operator[](i);
}
const T& operator[](unsigned int i) const
{
if (i<0||this->size()<=i) throw Range_error(i);
return std::vector<T>::operator[](i);
}
};
// disgusting macro hack to get a range checked vector:
#define vector Vector
As you can see, there's no initializer_list
constructor.
At this point, your options are limited.
std_lib_facilities.h
#undef vector
after including std_lib_facilities.h
You can replace Vector
class template constructors inherited constructors (using vector<T>::vector;
):
template< class T> struct Vector : public std::vector<T> {
typedef typename std::vector<T>::size_type size_type;
using std::vector<T>::vector;
T& operator[](unsigned int i) // rather than return at(i);
{
if (i<0||this->size()<=i) throw Range_error(i);
return std::vector<T>::operator[](i);
}
const T& operator[](unsigned int i) const
{
if (i<0||this->size()<=i) throw Range_error(i);
return std::vector<T>::operator[](i);
}
};
Upvotes: 1