Reputation: 691
I have xml like this:
<horo>
<aries>
<today>
Сегодня вас могут здорово огорчить. Если от расстройства все начнет валится из рук, просто спокойно сядьте и тихонько подождите хорошей новости.
</today>
</aries>
<taurus>
<today>
Сегодня у вас могут возникнуть проблемы на личном фронте. Спасти вас от перспективы оказаться не у дел может сухой, рациональный и в высшей степени объективный подход к проблеме.
</today>
</taurus>
</horo>
And now i learning kotlin whith retrofit. I include libraries for parse xml, and not i cant understand how create object for parsing this xml. I have object:
@Root(name = "horo", strict = false)
open class DailyHoroscope{
@get : Element(name = "aries") var aries : Aries? = null
}
@Root(name = "aries", strict = false)
open class Aries{
@get : Element(name = "today") var today : String? = null
}
but i have error:
rg.simpleframework.xml.core.ConstructorException: Default constructor can not accept read only @org.simpleframework.xml.Element(data=false, name=aries, required=true, type=void) on method 'aries' in class ac.kotlintest.model.
upd
i writed code in java:
@Root(name = "horo", strict = false)
public class DailyHoroscopeJ {
@Element(name = "aries")
public Aries aries;
public Aries getAries() {
return aries;
}
public void setAries(Aries aries) {
this.aries = aries;
}
}
@Root(name = "aries", strict = false)
class Aries{
@Element(name = "today")
public String today;
public String getToday() {
return today;
}
public void setToday(String today) {
this.today = today;
}
}
and it work fine, then i convert to kotlin
@Root(name = "horo", strict = false)
class DailyHoroscope {
@get:Element(name = "aries")
var aries:Aries? = null
}
@Root(name = "aries", strict = false) class Aries {
@get:Element(name = "today")
var today:String? = null
}
but i have same problem((((
Upvotes: 6
Views: 9597
Reputation: 306
The answer of @daementus is almost perfect. If you want to use constructor injection with default parameters, you have to force Kotlin to generate constructor overloads:
data class Section @JvmOverloads constructor(
@field:Element(name = "id")
@param:Element(name = "id")
val id: Long,
@field:Attribute(name = "title", required = false)
@param:Attribute(name = "title", required = false)
val title: String = ""
)
Without it you will get Constructor not matched for class Section. By default Kotlin generates a constructor with all parameters and a special constructor.
Note: I would prefer to answer in the comments but I don't have enough points.
Upvotes: 23
Reputation: 1157
Indeed, Simple XML Framework has a few problems with Kotlin attributes and it can be a little tricky to get things to work.
To be honest, I am not quite sure what is the problem in your specific case, but I'd guess that the annotation shouldn't be specified for the getter, but rather for the field.
Anyway, I am combining Simple XML and Kotlin data classes this way, and it seems to be working fine :)
data class Section (
@field:Element(name = "id", required = false)
@param:Element(name = "id", required = false)
val id: Long? = null,
@field:Attribute(name = "title", required = false)
@param:Attribute(name = "title", required = false)
val title: String? = null
)
Edit: If you don't want to use data classes (which I highly recommend, but you might have a reason), this should work without the "data" keyword just fine. If you don't wish to create a constructor, just move the attribute declarations directly into the class and get rid of the @param annotation (the @field must stay).
Upvotes: 15