Reputation: 2325
I new to SSO and I've only tried pysaml2
by far.
I am also aware of python3-saml
library (and its python-saml
Python 2 flavour).
I need to use one of those with Shibboleth, if it is relevant.
What are the pros and cons of pysaml2
and python3-saml
?
Update:
As for 2019, I still find python3-saml to be the best option if you need to implement an SP. It is not flawless (sorry @smartin, hhehe), but it will give you much less headache than pysaml2.
Upvotes: 11
Views: 10165
Reputation: 659
@smartin - one thing I'd love to have you do is integrate xmlsec1 library into your package the way saml2 does. I had to spend a few days getting xmlsec1 to install on Heroku - huge time drain. Ended up having to create a docker file and download from source to make it work. Not sure how big of a deal it is for most, but was a huge pain for Heroku.
After all that, I was wondering why saml2 didn't need this to work and saw this import:
from saml2.sigver import get_xmlsec_binary
Just thought I'd share.
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 3037
Both projects are compatible with Shibboleth.
pysaml2 is older than python3-saml, right now both support py2 and py3. Both are kinda active and documented.
python3-saml follows the structure of Onelogin's SAML toolkit so if you used any other toolkit before (php-saml, ruby-saml, java-saml), will be easy for you to handle with it (similar methods, same settings).
Differences
Crypto:
Functionality:
Settings:
In my opinion, python3-saml is easier than pysaml2, settings are more precise and its repo contains code examples on how integrate a django or a flask app and a guide at the docs.
Note: I'm the author of python3-saml
Upvotes: 14