Reputation: 1
Currently, I am conducting research on the probability of a CEO leaving the company (binary variable="1" if left). My data is unbalanced panel data for 50 companies with 51 individuals in it for the period 2013-2015.
I was trying to run two regression models (fixed and random effects) using the glmmML
package. However, I get the following warning:
pdata <- plm.data(ceodata, index=c("id","year"))
fixed <- glmmboot(left ~ age+tenure+boardappr+ROE,
family=binomial(link="logit"), data=pdata, cluster=id)
Warning messages:
1: In model.response(mf, "numeric") : using type = "numeric" with a factor response will be ignored
2: In glmmbootFit(X, Y, weights, start.coef, cluster, offset, family, :[glmmboot:] Information non-positive definite. No variance!
3: In Ops.factor(Y, res$fitted) : ‘/’ not meaningful for factors
4: In Ops.factor(Y, log(ifelse(Y == 0, 1, Y/res$fitted))) ‘*’ not meaningful for factors
5: In Ops.factor(1, Y) : ‘-’ not meaningful for factors
6: In Ops.factor(1, Y) : ‘-’ not meaningful for factors
When I change the set of variables I get the same warning and meaningless regression results. I was wondering if I am doing something wrong or there is an issue with the data I use? Perhaps, someone can share the code to run fixed and random effect models as well as Hausman test for logistic regression?
P.S. The data I use look like this:
Upvotes: 0
Views: 2860
Reputation: 226761
The proximal problem here is that (unlike glm
in base R and models copying its pattern) glmmML
doesn't allow categorical variables as responses. Presumably
pdata <- transform(pdata,left=as.numeric(left)-1)
(in this particular case, as.numeric(as.character(left))
would give the same results ...) will help with that: it will translate the first factor level to 0 and the second to 1.
I don't know much about glmmML
: I gave an answer here showing how to implement a Hausman test for models fitted with stats::glm
and lme4::glmer
...
Upvotes: 1