Mapping a ulong to a long in C#?

Question

I am trying to map a ulong to a long (and vice-versa), and a uint to a int (and vice-versa), as shown below - in order to save the values in a MS-SQL-database with signed types integer and biginteger only.

I do this because I have to check (in the database) whether a number (uint, ulong) is within which range in a bunch of uint/ulong ranges (IPs - v4 & v6; actually the ulong is in reality a uint128 composed of two ulongs).

Is there a more efficient way to accomplish this than the code I have here:

public static ulong SignedLongToUnsignedLong(long signedLongValue)
{
    ulong backConverted = 0;

    // map ulong to long [ 9223372036854775808 = abs(long.MinValue) ]
    if (signedLongValue < 0)
    {
        // Cannot take abs from MinValue
        backConverted = (ulong)System.Math.Abs(signedLongValue - 1);
        backConverted = 9223372036854775808 - backConverted - 1;
    }
    else
    {
        backConverted = (ulong)signedLongValue;
        backConverted += 9223372036854775808;
    }

    return backConverted;
}


public static long UnsignedLongToSignedLong(ulong unsignedLongValue)
{
    // map ulong to long [ 9223372036854775808 = abs(long.MinValue) ]
    return (long) (unsignedLongValue - 9223372036854775808);
}


public static int UnsignedIntToSignedInt(uint unsignedIntValue)
{
    // map uint to int [ 2147483648 = abs(long.MinValue) ]
    return (int)(unsignedIntValue - 2147483648);
}


public static uint SignedIntToUnsignedInt(int signedIntValue)
{
    uint backConverted = 0;

    // map ulong to long [ 2147483648 = abs(long.MinValue) ]
    if (signedIntValue < 0)
    {
        // Cannot take abs from MinValue
        backConverted = (uint)System.Math.Abs(signedIntValue - 1);
        backConverted = 2147483648 - backConverted - 1;
    }
    else
    {
        backConverted = (uint)signedIntValue;
        backConverted += 2147483648;
    }

    return backConverted;
}


public static void TestLong()
{
    long min_long = -9223372036854775808;
    long max_long = 9223372036854775807;

    ulong min_ulong = ulong.MinValue; // 0
    ulong max_ulong = ulong.MaxValue; // 18446744073709551615  = (2^64)-1

    long dbValueMin = UnsignedLongToSignedLong(min_ulong);
    long dbValueMax = UnsignedLongToSignedLong(max_ulong);


    ulong valueFromDbMin = SignedLongToUnsignedLong(dbValueMin);
    ulong valueFromDbMax = SignedLongToUnsignedLong(dbValueMax);

    System.Console.WriteLine(dbValueMin);
    System.Console.WriteLine(dbValueMax);

    System.Console.WriteLine(valueFromDbMin);
    System.Console.WriteLine(valueFromDbMax);
}


public static void TestInt()
{
    int min_int = -2147483648; // int.MinValue
    int max_int = 2147483647; // int.MaxValue

    uint min_uint= uint.MinValue; // 0
    uint max_uint = uint.MaxValue; // 4294967295 = (2^32)-1


    int dbValueMin = UnsignedIntToSignedInt(min_uint);
    int dbValueMax = UnsignedIntToSignedInt(max_uint);

    uint valueFromDbMin = SignedIntToUnsignedInt(dbValueMin);
    uint valueFromDbMax = SignedIntToUnsignedInt(dbValueMax);

    System.Console.WriteLine(dbValueMin);
    System.Console.WriteLine(dbValueMax);

    System.Console.WriteLine(valueFromDbMin);
    System.Console.WriteLine(valueFromDbMax);
}

Answer 1

Option 1: order-preserving map

It sounds like you're asking for a map which preserves order, meaning that, for example, if x and y are ulongs and x < y, then MapUlongToLong(x) < MapUlongToLong(y).

Here's how to do that:

To map from ulong to long, cast and add long.MinValue. To map from long back to ulong, subtract long.MinValue and cast. In either case, use an unchecked context so that overflow conditions are ignored.

public static long MapUlongToLong(ulong ulongValue)
{
    return unchecked((long)ulongValue + long.MinValue);
}

public static ulong MapLongToUlong(long longValue)
{
    return unchecked((ulong)(longValue - long.MinValue));
}

The logic for uint and int is exactly analogous.

(Option 1 is the original answer I wrote in 2016. I added option 2, and the comparison of the two, in 2021.)

Option 2: non-order-preserving map

I don't think this is what you're asking for, but it's even easier to do the conversion if you don't care about preserving order.

These functions work the same way as the above functions, except that we don't bother to add or subtract long.MinValue.

public static long MapUlongToLong(ulong ulongValue)
{
    return unchecked((long)ulongValue);
}

public static ulong MapLongToUlong(long longValue)
{
    return unchecked((ulong)longValue);
}

Which option is better?

Option 1 preserves order and option 2 doesn't, so if you need to preserve order, use option 1.

How long do the functions in option 1 take to execute? Well, those functions will probably be inlined and optimized by the JIT compiler, and they're ultimately asking the CPU to do something very, very simple. I'm guessing that each function call will take less than 1 nanosecond.

One of the comments describes this less-than-a-nanosecond execution time as being "relatively slow." If a nanosecond is too slow for you, you may want to use option 2.

The functions in option 2 will also probably be inlined and optimized by the JIT compiler, and it turns out that as far as the CPU is concerned, those functions do literally nothing. Therefore, no machine code will be generated for those functions, and so each function call will take no time at all—in other words, 0 nanoseconds.

Aron's answer does the same thing as option 2, and I'm guessing that it will run equally fast, too.

Answer 2

Necromancing.
Generic answer based on the answer of Tanner Swett:

private static class Number<T>
{

    private static object GetConstValue(System.Type t, string propertyName)
    {
        System.Reflection.FieldInfo pi = t.GetField(propertyName, System.Reflection.BindingFlags.Static
            | System.Reflection.BindingFlags.Public
            | System.Reflection.BindingFlags.NonPublic
            );

        return pi.GetValue(null);
    }

    private static T GetMinValue<T>()
    {
        return (T)GetConstValue(typeof(T), "MinValue");
    }

    private static T GetMaxValue<T>()
    {
        return (T)GetConstValue(typeof(T), "MaxValue");
    }


    private static System.Func<T, T, T> CompileAdd<T>()
    {
        // Declare the parameters
        System.Linq.Expressions.ParameterExpression paramA =
            System.Linq.Expressions.Expression.Parameter(typeof(T), "a");

        System.Linq.Expressions.ParameterExpression paramB =
            System.Linq.Expressions.Expression.Parameter(typeof(T), "b");

        // Add the parameters
        System.Linq.Expressions.BinaryExpression body =
            System.Linq.Expressions.Expression.Add(paramA, paramB);

        // Compile it
        System.Func<T, T, T> add =
            System.Linq.Expressions.Expression.Lambda<System.Func<T, T, T>>
            (body, paramA, paramB).Compile();

        return add;
    }


    private static System.Func<T, T, T> CompileSubtract<T>()
    {
        // Declare the parameters
        System.Linq.Expressions.ParameterExpression paramA =
            System.Linq.Expressions.Expression.Parameter(typeof(T), "a");

        System.Linq.Expressions.ParameterExpression paramB =
            System.Linq.Expressions.Expression.Parameter(typeof(T), "b");

        // Subtract the parameters
        System.Linq.Expressions.BinaryExpression body =
            System.Linq.Expressions.Expression.Subtract(paramA, paramB);

        // Compile it
        System.Func<T, T, T> subtract =
            System.Linq.Expressions.Expression.Lambda<System.Func<T, T, T>>
            (body, paramA, paramB).Compile();

        return subtract;
    }

    public static T MinValue = GetMinValue<T>();
    public static T MaxValue = GetMaxValue<T>();
    public static System.Func<T, T, T> Add = CompileAdd<T>();
    public static System.Func<T, T, T> Subtract = CompileSubtract<T>();
}



public static TSigned MapUnsignedToSigned<TUnsigned, TSigned>(TUnsigned ulongValue)
{
    TSigned signed = default(TSigned);
    unchecked
    {
        signed = Number<TSigned>.Add((TSigned)(dynamic)ulongValue, Number<TSigned>.MinValue);
    }

    return signed;
}


public static TUnsigned MapSignedToUnsigned<TSigned, TUnsigned>(TSigned longValue)
{
    TUnsigned unsigned = default(TUnsigned);
    unchecked
    {
        unsigned = (TUnsigned)(dynamic) Number<TSigned>
            .Subtract(longValue, Number<TSigned>.MinValue);
    }

    return unsigned;
}

equivalent:

// return MapUnsignedToSigned<ulong, long>(ulongValue);
private static long MapULongToLong(ulong ulongValue)
{
    return unchecked((long)ulongValue + long.MinValue);
}


// return MapSignedToUnsigned<long, ulong>(longValue);
private static ulong MapLongToUlong(long longValue)
{
    return unchecked((ulong)(longValue - long.MinValue));
}

Answer 3

Althought Tanner Swett is correct. A much nicer and dirty solution is to tell .net to map access for a ulong to the same memory address as a long. This will give you instantaneous conversion speed.

void Main()
{
    var foo = new Foo { Long = -1 };

    Console.WriteLine(foo.ULong);
}

// Define other methods and classes here
[StructLayout(LayoutKind.Explicit)]
public class Foo
{
    [FieldOffset(0)]
    private ulong _ulong;

    [FieldOffset(0)]
    private long _long;

    public long Long
    {
        get { return _long; }
        set { _long = value; }
    }

    public ulong ULong
    {
        get { return _ulong; }
        set { _ulong = value; }
    }
}

By setting your entity framework POCO to use the attributes shown, you can control the memory addresses that the fields are mapped to.

Therefore, no conversion ever occurs.

This code is 100% faster than Tanner Swett's.