kgf3JfUtW
kgf3JfUtW

Reputation: 14928

cppcheck How to suppress inline unmatched suppression?

I found that --suppress=unmatchedSuppression only suppresses unmatched suppression types in cppcheck options, but NOT unmatched inline suppressions.

Is this the expected behavior?

test.c

I have inline cppcheck-suppress for both lines.

  1 void f() {
  2     char arr[5];
  3     // cppcheck-suppress arrayIndexOutOfBounds
  4     arr[10] = 0;
  5
  6     // cppcheck-suppress arrayIndexOutOfBounds
  7     const char ok[] = "this line is ok";
  8 }

Situation 1

Suppress cstyleCast, which does NOT exist in code.

 cppcheck --inline-suppr --force --enable=all 
          --xml-version=2 --suppress=cstyleCast test.c 
          2>cppcheckresults.xml

I get warned about (among other irrelevant warnings)

  1. unmatchedSuppression: arrayIndexOutOfBounds in test.c line 7 (as expected)

  2. unmatchedSuppression: cstyleCast in * line 0 (as expected)

Situation 2

Same as situation 1, but with additional --suppress=unmatchedSuppression option

 cppcheck --inline-suppr --force --enable=all 
          --xml-version=2 --suppress=cstyleCast --suppress=unmatchedSuppressiontest.c 
          2>cppcheckresults.xml

I expect both previous unmatchedSuppression warnings to go away. But I still get

  1. unmatchedSuppression in test.c line 7 (NOT expected)

Upvotes: 11

Views: 12812

Answers (2)

alfC
alfC

Reputation: 16242

The problem with the order solution is that you have to do this for every file that has the unmatched suppression.

A. In the command line use the option --suppress=unmatchedSuppression:{}. (note the curly braces)

B. What I discovered is that you can also suppress the unmatched suppression itself in place, for example:

        // cppcheck-suppress[assertWithSideEffect,unmatchedSuppression]
        assert(...);

(tested with cppcheck 2.3 and 2.5)

This is necessary for example when running cppcheck 2.3 which didn't have the assertWithSideEffect feature, later availabe in cppcheck 2.5.

Ideally, as you bump the cppcheck version you can start removing the unnecessary unmatchedSuppression. Needless to say, this all needs the command line --inline-suppr.

Upvotes: 2

Kurtis Rader
Kurtis Rader

Reputation: 7459

What I recently found is that an unmatchedSuppression warning from inline suppressions cannot be suppressed by a generic --suppress=unmatchedSuppression or putting just that warning ID in a --suppressions-list file. You have to qualify it with the filename. For example --suppress=unmatchedSuppression:test.c.

Upvotes: 5

Related Questions