Reputation: 60861
Is it possible to generalize the solution to work for any type?
There is a wonderful solution to asserting whether a specified attribute exists on a method:
public static MethodInfo MethodOf( Expression<System.Action> expression )
{
MethodCallExpression body = (MethodCallExpression)expression.Body;
return body.Method;
}
public static bool MethodHasAuthorizeAttribute( Expression<System.Action> expression )
{
var method = MethodOf( expression );
const bool includeInherited = false;
return method.GetCustomAttributes( typeof( AuthorizeAttribute ), includeInherited ).Any();
}
The usage would be something like this:
var sut = new SystemUnderTest();
var y = MethodHasAuthorizeAttribute(() => sut.myMethod());
Assert.That(y);
How do we generalize this solution and change the signature from:
public static bool MethodHasAuthorizeAttribute(Expression<System.Action> expression)
to something like this:
public static bool MethodHasSpecifiedAttribute(Expression<System.Action> expression, Type specifiedAttribute)
Is it possible to generalize the solution to work for any type?
Upvotes: 0
Views: 207
Reputation: 7029
public static MethodInfo MethodOf(Expression<Action> expression)
{
MethodCallExpression body = (MethodCallExpression)expression.Body;
return body.Method;
}
public static bool MethodHasAttribute(Expression<Action> expression, Type attributeType)
{
var method = MethodOf(expression);
const bool includeInherited = false;
return method.GetCustomAttributes(attributeType, includeInherited).Any();
}
Or with generics:
public static bool MethodHasAttribute<TAttribute>(Expression<Action> expression)
where TAttribute : Attribute
{
var method = MethodOf(expression);
const bool includeInherited = false;
return method.GetCustomAttributes(typeof(TAttribute), includeInherited).Any();
}
Which you would call like this:
var sut = new SystemUnderTest();
y = MethodHasAttribute<AuthorizeAttribute>(() => sut.myMethod());
That(y);
Upvotes: 2