Reputation: 713
My Delphi Berlin app uses TIdHttpServer
to get some data from client via HTTP GET, process it and send it back.
All logic is performed within a single event handler: OnCommandGet
. The identifier is received in a QueryString, then data will be transformed and returned back to client inside the same OnCommandGet
event handler.
Data transformation is implemented in a separate thread which uses PostMessage
to inform the main thread that the worker thread completes the execution and the data is ready to be sent back to client.
The data is sent in a AResponseInfo.ContentText
property.
My question is:
How do I make
OnCommandGet
handler wait until the worker thread does its job and sends the pointer to a transformed data, so I can get the value and fire it back in aAResponseInfo.ContentText
?
UPDATE
Here is the pseudo-code I want to execute:
type
TMyResponsesArray = array[0..5] of TMyObjectAttributes;
PMyResponsesArray = ^TMyResponsesArray;
{There will be 6 tasks run in parallel. Tasks' responses
will be stored in the below declared Responses array.}
var
Responses: TMyResponsesArray;
{Below is a Server handler, which takes the input parameter and calls
a proc which runs 6 threads in parallel. The result of each thread is
stored as an ordered array value. Only when the array is completely
populated, ServerCommandGet may send the response!}
procedure TMainForm.ServerCommandGet(AContext: TIdContext;
ARequestInfo: TIdHTTPRequestInfo; AResponseInfo: TIdHTTPResponseInfo);
var
ObjectId: string;
begin
ObjectId := ARequestInfo.Params.Values['oid'];
RunTasksInParallel(ObjectId);
end;
{Below is a procedure invoked by ServerCommandGet. It runs 6 tasks in
parallel. Each of the thread instantiates an object, sets its basic
parameter and fires the method. Each task runs queued. When each thread
completes the job, it sends a WM to the main thread (via ParentHandler
which must accept and process the response.}
procedure TMainForm.RunTasksInParallel(const ObjectId: string);
const
c: array[0..5] of Byte = (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5);
var
ParentHandle: HWND;
begin
{running 6 tasks in parallel}
TTask.Run(
procedure
begin
TParallel.For(Low(c), High(c),
procedure(index: Integer)
var
MyObj: TMyObject;
i: Byte;
begin
i := c[index];
MyObj := TMyObject.Create;
try
MyObj.SetMyParameter := Random(10);
Responses[i] := MyObj.CallMyMethd(ObjectId);
TThread.Queue(nil,
procedure
begin
SendMessage(ParentHandle,
UM_DATAPACKET, i, Integer(@Responses));
end);
finally
MyObj.Free;
end;
end);
end);
end;
{Now the WM handler. It decreases internal task counter and when
TaskCounter = 0, it means that all tasks finished execution and the
Responses array is fully populated. Then we somehow need to pass the
Response array to the ServerCommandGet and send it back to client...}
procedure TMainForm.OnDataPacket(var Msg: TMessage);
begin
i := Msg.WParam;
Responses := PMyResponsesArray(Msg.LParam)^;
{Skipped for for brevity:
When ALL tasks have finished execution, the Responses array is FULL.
Then all array values are wrapped into XML and sent back to initial
invoker ** ServerCommandGet ** which must send XML to client.}
end;
Upvotes: 0
Views: 1004
Reputation: 595295
Your use of a global Responses
array is not safe, unless you limit TIdHTTPServer
to allow only 1 connected client at a time. Otherwise, you could potentially have multiple clients sending requests at the same time and overwriting each other's values in the array. Each invokation of ServerCommandGet()
should use a local array instead.
TIdHTTPServer
is not designed for the type of asynchronous processing you are attempting to do. ServerCommandGet()
must block, as TIdHTTPServer
sends a response to the client when the OnCommandGet
handler exits, unless the handler sends a response first, which you are not doing. So, regarding your task thread management, I would suggest either:
getting rid of TTask.Run()
and have RunTasksInParallel()
call TParallel.For()
directly.
or at least calling TTask.Wait()
on the TTask
object that is calling TParallel.For()
.
Either way will make RunTasksInParallel()
block (and thus make ServerCommandGet()
block) until all tasks have finished. Then you can send the response to the client immediately when RunTasksInParallel()
exits. You don't need to wait for the tasks to post UM_DATAPACKET
to the main thread and round-trip back into TIdHTTPServer
. If you are using UM_DATAPACKET
for other things, that's fine, but I do not recommend using it for your HTTP processing.
Try something more like this instead:
const
MaxResponses = 6;
type
TMyResponsesArray = array[0..MaxResponses-1] of TMyObjectAttributes;
{$POINTERMATH ON}
PMyResponsesArray = ^TMyResponsesArray;
{There will be 6 tasks run in parallel. Tasks' responses
will be stored in the below declared Responses array.}
procedure TMainForm.ServerCommandGet(AContext: TIdContext;
ARequestInfo: TIdHTTPRequestInfo; AResponseInfo: TIdHTTPResponseInfo);
var
ObjectId: string;
Responses: TMyResponsesArray;
begin
ObjectId := ARequestInfo.Params.Values['oid'];
RunTasksInParallel(ObjectId, @Responses);
{ALL tasks have finished execution, the Responses array is FULL.
Wrap all array values into XML and send it back to the client.}
end;
{Below is a procedure invoked by ServerCommandGet. It runs 6 tasks in
parallel. Each of the thread instantiates an object, sets its basic
parameter and fires the method.}
procedure TMainForm.RunTasksInParallel(const ObjectId: string; Responses: PMyResponsesArray);
begin
{running 6 tasks in parallel}
TParallel.For(0, MaxResponses-1,
procedure(index: Integer)
var
MyObj: TMyObject;
begin
MyObj := TMyObject.Create;
try
MyObj.SetMyParameter := Random(10);
Responses[index] := MyObj.CallMyMethd(ObjectId);
finally
MyObj.Free;
end;
end
);
end;
I would also not recommend doing the database updates in the main thread, either. If you can't update the database directly in ServerCommandGet()
, or directly in the individual task threads, then I would suggest having a separate thread dedicated for database updates that you post to as needed. Stay out of the main thread as much as possible.
Upvotes: 1