CODEWITHSUNDEEP
c++opencvimage-processingopenclimread
Suraksha Ajith
Suraksha Ajith

Reputation: 892

OpenCL copyto() consumes more time

I am comparing OpenCL UMat with that of OpenCL Mat, I run the cvtColor() function for 500 times. 

int OpenCL_UMat()
{
    Mat img;
    UMat uimage, U1;
    img = imread("image_path");
    for (int i = 1; i < 500; i++)
    {
        img.copyTo(uimage); // Here it takes 1 sec
        cvtColor(uimage, U1, CV_BGR2GRAY);
    }
    imshow("image1", U1);
    return 0;
}

int OpenCL_Mat()
{
    Mat img, img1;
    img = imread("image_path");
    for (int i = 1; i < 500; i++)
    {
        cvtColor(img, img1, CV_BGR2GRAY);
    }
    imshow("image1", img);
    return 0;
}

The output for the code in microseconds is
_________________________________
| OpenCL UMat= 2368720 microseconds-|
|_________________________________|
| OpenCL Mat = 312200 microseconds----|
|_________________________________|

From the above code i found that copyto() function needs time to load the image from RAM on to GPU, so when the copyto() function runs, it consumes 1 sec to execute.

Is there any option, where i can directly make use of UMat.
Something like this
UMat img = imread("image_path");

Upvotes: 2

Views: 476

Answers (1)

w1ck3dg0ph3r
w1ck3dg0ph3r

Reputation: 1011

You can use 

UMat img = imread("image_path").getUMat(ACCESS_READ);

Upvotes: 2

Related Questions