Reputation: 75
def merge (l1,l2):
if l1 and l2:
if l1 == [] and l2 == []:
return []
if l1[0] > l2[0]:
l1, l2 = l2, l1
return [l1[0]] + merge(l1[1:], l2)
return l1 + l2
def sort(l):
x = len(l) / 2
x = int(x)
y = merge(l[0:x], l[x+1:])
return y
I need to write a recursive function named sort; it is passed any unordered list (all int or all str) and it returns a new list that contains every value from its argument list, but in sorted/non-descending order. But I cannot call any of Python’s functions/methods that perform sorting.
also, For any list that has at least 2 values, I have to break the list in half and recursively call sort to sort each smaller list, I have to use the merge function, written above, to merge these two sorted lists returned from these recursive calls
merge is a function to combine and sort two list
merge([1,3,5,8,12],[2,3,6,7,10,15]) returns [1,2,3,3,5,6,7,8,10,12,15].
For example, calling sort([4,5,3,1,6,7,2]) would call sort recursively on the lists [4,5,3] and [1,6,7,2]), returning the lists [3,4,5] and [1,2,6,7] respectively, which when merged would return the list [1,2,3,4,5,6,7].
My function got the following error
39 *Error: sort([1,2,3,4,5,6,7]) -> [1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7] but should -> [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]
40 *Error: sort([7,6,5,4,3,2,1]) -> [3, 2, 1, 7, 6, 5] but should -> [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]
41 *Error: sort([4,5,3,1,2,7,6]) -> [2, 4, 5, 3, 7, 6] but should -> [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]
42 *Error: sort([1,7,2,6,3,5,4]) -> [1, 3, 5, 4, 7, 2] but should -> [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]
What is wrong with me sort method? can someone help me to fix it? thanks in advance.
Upvotes: 2
Views: 342
Reputation: 28626
Three problems:
y = merge(l[0:x], l[x+1:])
loses l[x]
, make it y = merge(l[:x], l[x:])
.y = merge(sort(l[:x]), sort(l[x:]))
.Corrected and simplified a bit:
def sort(l):
if len(l) <= 1:
return l
x = len(l) // 2
return merge(sort(l[:x]), sort(l[x:]))
The //
is integer division so you don't need the extra int(...)
. And no point in creating that y
variable.
Btw, the if l1 == [] and l2 == []:
test inside if l1 and l2:
is pointless (if l1
and l2
were []
, you wouldn't get inside the if l1 and l2:
block in the first place), so you can remove it.
One more thing: While your merge
function isn't wrong, it's slow. Every l1[1:]
takes time proportional to the length of l1
. You'd better uses indexes, like for example in Huy Vo's answer.
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 2500
What you need is a merge sort, I believe there are multiple merge sort pseudocodes on the internet.
Anyway, here is a version of mine in Python 3:
def mergesort(lst):
if len(lst) < 2:
return lst
else:
middle = len(lst) // 2
# recursion, baby
left_half = mergesort(lst[:middle])
right_half = mergesort(lst[middle:])
return merge(left_half, right_half)
def merge(left, right):
result = []
i, j = 0, 0
while i < len(left) and j < len(right):
if left[i] <= right[j]:
result.append(left[i])
i += 1
elif left[i] > right[j]:
result.append(right[j])
j += 1
result += left[i:] + right[j:]
return result
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 57
Ok basically everything you're doing is redundant.
list1 = [1,3,5,8,12]
list2 = [2,3,6,7,10,15]
list3 = list1 + list2 # Merges lists
list3_sorted = sorted(list3) # Sorts them
Also a little bonus, if you have a list of lists or tuples and you want to sort by an index of each of those
from operator import itemgetter
list = [(2,6), (3,4)]
list_sorted = sorted( list, key=itemgetter(1) ) # Will sort by index 1 of each item.
Edit: I now realise that you can't use any built in functions, give me a little to mess around and see if I can figure something out
Upvotes: 0