CODEWITHSUNDEEP
javascriptsetteres6-class
1fabiopereira
1fabiopereira

Reputation: 542

Setters in Javascript

I want to block the assignment of properties only by the set name function because I want to do some formatting or validation before, look the example:

class Animal {
    construct(name){
    this.name = name;
    return this;
  }

  setName(name){
    this.name = name;
  }

  getName(){
    return this.name;
  }
}


class Dog extends Animal {

    constructor(name){
    super(name);
    return this;
  }

  setName(name){
    this.name = name.charAt(0).toUpperCase() + name.slice(1);
  }
}

const dog = new Dog();

dog.setName('joe');
console.log(dog.getName()); //Joe

dog.name = 'Bill'; // I wish this type of assignment would not work
console.log(dog.getName()); //Bill

It is possible to do this or something similar ?

Upvotes: 0

Views: 54

Answers (3)

ceving
ceving

Reputation: 23826

You can define accessors but you can not have them together with values. Mozilla documentation:

It is not possible to simultaneously have a getter bound to a property and have that property actually hold a value

I answered this already with an example for arrays.

Upvotes: 1

Madara's Ghost
Madara's Ghost

Reputation: 174967

You can't lock it down 100%, but there is the setter syntax:

class Foo {
  constructor(x) {
    this.x = x;
  }

  set x(newX) {
    this._x = newX.charAt(0).toUpperCase() + newX.slice(1);
  }

  get x() {
    return this._x;
  }
}

const foo = new Foo('hello');
console.log(foo.x); // Hello
foo.x = 'goodbye';
console.log(foo.x); // Goodbye

To be fair, though, I'd have this logic on the getter, rather than the setter. You generally do these cosmetic things on output, not on input.

Note that this still doesn't prevent your consumer from editing foo._x, there are no private variables in JavaScript.

Upvotes: 2

towc
towc

Reputation: 2034

It is possible indeed!

If you look at the mdn page for set, you'll get some nice clues to how to solve your problem.

The general gist is that you can define set propName as a function to which the new value is set, and within that function you can apply any transformation!

Upvotes: 1

Related Questions