Reputation: 123
I am trying to implement a vector (in the math sense) using templates. I would like to define standard vector constants in the class. I managed to do it for simple constants (all zeroes, all ones) but I am now struggling to define the more difficult unit vectors (all zeroes except one component set to one at given index).
I did not yet find an elegant way to do that. Here is how I would like to define that:
#include <iostream>
template<unsigned int tSize, typename tReal>
class Vector {
public:
template<unsigned int tIndex>
static const Vector msUnit;
inline Vector () {}
template<typename...tTypes>
inline Vector (tTypes...pVals) {
set(mReals, pVals...);
}
inline tReal operator[] (unsigned int pIndex) {
return mReals[pIndex];
}
inline const tReal operator[] (unsigned int pIndex) const {
return mReals[pIndex];
}
protected:
template<typename tType>
void set (tReal* pPtr, const tType pVal) {
*pPtr = pVal;
}
template<typename tType, typename...tTypes>
void set (tReal* pPtr, const tType pVal, const tTypes...pVals) {
*pPtr = pVal;
set(pPtr+1, pVals...);
}
tReal mReals [tSize];
};
int main() {
Vector<3,double> lVec = Vector<3,double>::msUnit<2>;
std::cout << "Vector: (" << lVec[0] << ", " << lVec[1] << ", " << lVec[2] << ")" << std::endl;
return 0;
}
But I have not found a way to define the msUnit
static const member template.
I tried this:
template<unsigned int tIndex, unsigned int tSize, typename tReal>
const Vector<tSize,tReal> Vector<tSize,tReal>::msUnit<tIndex>;
But compilers (clang
& gcc
) complain:
prog.cc:43:48: error: nested name specifier 'Vector<tSize, tReal>::' for declaration does not refer into a class, class template or class template partial specialization
const Vector<tSize,tReal> Vector<tSize,tReal>::msUnit<tIndex>;
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
prog.cc:43:54: error: expected ';' at end of declaration
const Vector<tSize,tReal> Vector<tSize,tReal>::msUnit<tIndex>;
^
;
prog.cc:43:54: error: expected unqualified-id
Here is a live example of this test: http://melpon.org/wandbox/permlink/AzbuATU1lbjXkksX
Is it even possible to have static const template variable members in template classes ? And if so how ?
And I still have to find a way to provide an initializer for the msUnit
template.
Upvotes: 2
Views: 2530
Reputation: 1731
You already found the way how you can decleare your msUnit - you have to use two templates, i.e.
template<unsigned tSize, typename tReal>
template<unsigned tIndex>
const Vector<tSize, tReal> Vector<tSize, tReal>::msUnit;
As you have currently no matching constructor for initializing the n'th argument to one and all others to zero (which wouldn't make sense I guess), you can just use your own function. As you already access a static member of your class, you also have access to your complete class, so you can just use
template<unsigned int tSize, typename tReal>
class Vector {
public:
// ...
template<unsigned int tIndex>
static const Vector msUnit;
private:
static const Vector<tSize, tReal> createUnitVector(unsigned tIndex) {
Vector<tSize, tReal> v{};
v.mReals[tIndex] = tReal(1);
return v;
}
tReal mReals [tSize];
};
template<unsigned tSize, typename tReal>
template<unsigned tIndex>
const Vector<tSize, tReal> Vector<tSize, tReal>::msUnit{Vector::createUnitVector(tIndex)};
So everything as you already have it, but you initialize your vector with some other function given in your class.
Here you go for the live demo: http://melpon.org/wandbox/permlink/5b7cgXTeqXZDoCRp
Upvotes: 3