Reputation: 161
I want to check that whether the class has operator(). I tryied the following SFINAE.
#include <type_traits> //for std::true_type/false_type
#include <utility> //for std::declval
template <typename T, typename... A>
class has_call_operator {
private:
template <typename U, typename... P>
static auto check(U u, P... p) -> decltype(u(p...), std::true_type());
static auto check(...) -> decltype(std::false_type());
public:
using type
= decltype(check(std::declval<T>(), std::declval<A>()...));
static constexpr bool value = type::value;
};
At a glance, this is working correctlly.
#include <iostream>
struct test {
void operator()(const int x) {}
};
int main()
{
std::cout << std::boolalpha << has_call_operator<test, int>::value << std::endl; //true
return 0;
}
But, the abstract class was not worked correctly by it.
#include <iostream>
struct test {
void operator()(const int x) {}
virtual void do_something() = 0;
};
int main()
{
std::cout << std::boolalpha << has_call_operator<test, int>::value << std::endl; //false
return 0;
}
Why does not this code work? Also, could you make this code work?
Upvotes: 1
Views: 128
Reputation: 217283
You take U
by value, so it requires also the construction of the type.
Pass by const reference to fix that.
You may look at is_detected
and have something like:
template <typename T, typename ...Ts>
using call_operator_type = decltype(std::declval<T>()(std::declval<Ts>()...));
template <typename T, typename ... Args>
using has_call_operator = is_detected<call_operator_type, T, Args...>;
Upvotes: 2