Reputation: 6896
I have many scripts and css that I wrote in my MVC project.
I'm using Bundling and Minification and I know I can bundle them all togther like this:
bundles.Add(new StyleBundle("~/Content/site/").Include("~/Content/site/*.css"));
bundles.Add(new ScriptBundle("~/bundles/site").Include("~/Scripts/site/*.js"));
The problem is that I don't want to Render
all the scripts and css together, I need one or two in each View, I know that I can manually register each script/css and then I will be able to render
them separately in each View:
bundles.Add(new ScriptBundle("~/bundles/script1").Include("~/Scripts/site/script1.js"));
bundles.Add(new ScriptBundle("~/bundles/script2").Include("~/Scripts/site/script2.js"));
And then in one View:
@section scripts{
@Scripts.Render("~/bundles/script1")
}
And in the second one:
@section scripts{
@Scripts.Render("~/bundles/script2")
}
My question is if this is correct or there is a better solution for that.
Upvotes: 0
Views: 1021
Reputation: 9463
Yes, it is correct to build multiple bundles that are tailored to the Views.
Note that you can add multiple specific scripts/styles to a bundle:
var commonJsBundle = new ScriptBundle("~/bundles/Common/Js");
commonJsBundle.Include("~/Scripts/jquery-{version}.js");
commonJsBundle.Include("~/Scripts/jquery-ui-{version}.js");
@Scripts.Render("~/bundles/Common/Js")
So you do not need to have a bundle for each individual script, rather bundle all custom scripts for a page (or Area) together.
PS: as noted by Stefan, there is a tradeoff between bundle size and the number of parallel connections a browser supports when downloading them. Therefore using many small bundles makes your page load slower. Maximum concurrent connections to the same domain for browsers
Upvotes: 4