Oblomov
Oblomov

Reputation: 9635

Emplace an aggregate in std::vector

I tried to initialize the std::vector

std::vector<Particle> particles;

with instances of the simple struct

struct Particle {
    int id;
    double x;
    double y;
    double theta;
    double weight;
};

by using emplace with an initializer list:

num_particles = 1000;
for (int i = 0; i < num_particles; i++)
{
    particles.emplace_back({ i,0.0,0.0,0.0,1 });
}

But I get the error

C2660 "std::vector>::emplace_back": Function doesn't accept one argument

How can I fix that?

Upvotes: 13

Views: 15781

Answers (3)

M&#225;rio Feroldi
M&#225;rio Feroldi

Reputation: 3591

std::vector::emplace expects an iterator as argument too, because it inserts the element before that iterator's position.

Another problem is that your {i, 0.0, 0.0, 1} initialization doesn't work because it isn't in a context which tells what type it needs to instantiate. The reason there isn't any context is due to emplace and emplace_back member functions having generic parameters.

If you just want to append elements to the vector, use emplace_back.

However, emplace_back depends on the element type having a valid constructor in order to work, as the element is initialized through parentheses. That changed in C++20, which now allows aggregate-initialization through parentheses without the need to define a valid constructor.

So, up until C++17, your example would be changed to:

for (int i = 0; i < num_particles; ++i)
    particles.push_back({i, 0.0, 0.0, 1});

And in C++20 and later, you may do this instead:

for (int i = 0; i < num_particles; ++i)
    particles.emplace_back(i, 0.0, 0.0, 1);

Upvotes: 16

odyss-jii
odyss-jii

Reputation: 2709

You have several issues with your code:

  • Emplace takes an iterator as insertion point, and then a list of values which serve as arguments to a constructor.

  • Your struct must have a constructor which takes the values you pass to emplace.

  • You only have 4 argument values in your code, but your Particle struct has 5 fields.

Try this code instead:

struct Particle {
    int id;
    double x;
    double y;
    double theta;
    double weight;

    Particle(int id, double x, double y, double theta, double weight) 
        : id(id), x(x), y(y), theta(theta), weight(weight)
    {
    }
};

Notice the constructor there. And then emplace, for instance in the beginning [just an example which is not inserting at the back (see below)]:

std::vector<Particle> particles;

auto num_particles = 1000;
for (int i = 0; i < num_particles; i++)
{
    particles.emplace(particles.begin(), i, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0, 0.0);
}

As others have noted, if you just want to insert without specifying a specific position in the vector, you can use emplace_back:

std::vector<Particle> particles;

auto num_particles = 1000;
for (int i = 0; i < num_particles; i++)
{
    particles.emplace_back(i, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0, 0.0);
}

This inserts the elements at the end of the vector.

Upvotes: 10

WhiZTiM
WhiZTiM

Reputation: 21576

First, std::vector::emplace requires the first argument passed to be an iterator representing the position where the element should be inserted.

Secondly, even if you provide the position. Template types are not deduced for initializer_lists. See initializer_list and template type deduction. So, below will equally fail:

particles.emplace( particles.end(), {i, 0.0, 0.0, 1, 1});

Since there is no constructor that can take the initializer list, below will likewise fail:

particles.emplace( particles.end(), i, 0.0, 0.0, 1, 1);

You either use insert or push_back as in:

particles.insert( particles.end(), {i, 0.0, 0.0, 1, 1});
particles.push_back({i, 0.0, 0.0, 1, 1});

or emplace or push_back:

particles.emplace( particles.end(), Particles{i, 0.0, 0.0, 1, 1});
particles.emplace_back(Particles{i, 0.0, 0.0, 1, 1});

Upvotes: 4

Related Questions