Reputation: 6957
Im in situation where I have many potential error sources. Is there an elegant solution to this mess?
How should I reject it?
function myFuction(hash) {
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
// this could return error
const id = atob(hash);
// this could return error
let data = firstFunction(id);
// return error if not true
if (data && data.id) {
// this could return error
return secondFunction(data.id)
.then(item => {
// return error if not true
if (item) {
// this could return error
return thirdFunction(item)
.then(payload => {
resolve('OK');
});
}
});
}
});
}
Upvotes: 0
Views: 38
Reputation: 664237
Avoid the Promise
constructor antipattern! You can use early returns with Promise.reject
or just throw
errors:
function myFuction(hash) {
return Promise.resolve().then(() => {
// this could throw error
const id = atob(hash);
// this could throw error
let data = firstFunction(id);
// return error if not true
if (!data || !data.id)
return Promise.reject(new Error("…")); // alternative: throw new Error("…");
return secondFunction(data.id);
}).then(item => {
// return error if not true
if (!item)
return Promise.reject(new Error("…")); // same here
return thirdFunction(item);
}).then(payload => 'OK');
}
(Additionally I applied some flattening, but as long as your always return
from promise callbacks you could nest as well)
Upvotes: 2