CODEWITHSUNDEEP
c#boxing
Tom Wright
Tom Wright

Reputation: 11479

Under what circumstances would boxing occur in modern C#?

I'm trying to explain boxing to a junior colleague.

The canonical example seems to be ArrayList. For example:

But this has been superseded by List<T> from C# 2, when generics were introduced (as explained in this answer).

So, in the age of generics, under what circumstances would I find myself boxing values?

Edit: To be clear, I'm not asking whether it is still possible to use boxing. I'm asking why we would use boxing now that generics have made ArrayList obsolete.

Edit 2: I thought this was already clear, but I'm also not asking about the difference between an ArrayList and a List<T>. In fact, this question is entirely premised on the fact that I appreciate that generics mean we don't have to use an ArrayList, and we therefore don't need to box values in these circumstances.

Upvotes: 3

Views: 184

Answers (2)

Mike Nakis
Mike Nakis

Reputation: 62015

Boxing and unboxing is not something that you explicitly do; it is something that happens all the time whenever you have a struct in your hands and you are passing it to some receiver that expects an object. So, consider this code:

public void SafeToString( Object a )
{
    if( a != null )
        return a.ToString();
    return "null";
}

SafeToString( 42 );

If you had said 42.ToString() there would be no boxing, because 42 is known by the compiler to have a ToString() method, and struct cannot be subclassed, so the ToString() method that operates on 42 is known at compilation time.

However, when you say SafeToString( 42 ); the 42 gets boxed into an object, which is passed to SafeToString(), which invokes Object.ToString(), which resolves to the boxing object's ToString(), which delegates to int.ToString().

Upvotes: 3

Sinatr
Sinatr

Reputation: 21999

Generics is a good thing, but they aren't capable completely remove the necessity of dealing with boxing.

ArrayList is obsolete, right, but sometimes you still going to use List<object> when storing different types in one list (when only Object is something they have in common).

Another example generic methods. Again, they are good if you know type at compile-time, but what if you want something to work with any type? Good old object parameter and boxing (with casting) to the rescue.

Upvotes: 2

Related Questions