Reputation: 443
I have 2 dicts like:
x = {2: {'a':1, 'b':1}}
y = {3: {'a':1}, 2: {'a':2, 'c':2}}
The merging result I want should be:
z = {3: {'a':1}, 2: {'a':3, 'b':1, 'c':2}}
I tried dict(x.items() + y.items())
and Counter
, but only get
{2: {'a': 2, 'c': 2}, 3: {'a': 1}}
as a result.
How can I merge dict whose value is also a dict itself?
I have explained that the difference between How to merge two Python dictionaries in a single expression? is that my dict's value is also a dict.
Upvotes: 1
Views: 173
Reputation: 697
# What about something like this:
# merge_nested_dicts.py
# tested under Python3.6
# assuming dict_02 overwrites dict_01
# one liner functional style
def deep_merge(dict_01, dict_02):
return {k: {**dict_01.get(k), **dict_02.get(k)} if k in dict_01 and
isinstance(dict_01.get(k), dict) and
isinstance(dict_02.get(k), dict) else v
for k, v in {**dict_01, **dict_02}.items()}
if __name__ == '__main__':
y = {2: {'a': 1, 'b': 1}, 1: {'a': 1, 'b': 1}}
x = {3: {'a': 1}, 2: {'a': 2, 'c': 2}}
print(x)
print(y)
print(deep_merge(x, y))
'''
{3: {'a': 1}, 2: {'a': 2, 'c': 2}}
{2: {'a': 1, 'b': 1}, 1: {'a': 1, 'b': 1}}
{3: {'a': 1}, 2: {'a': 1, 'c': 2, 'b': 1}, 1: {'a': 1, 'b': 1}}
'''
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 5343
I don't know what your definition of 'elegantly' is but assuming you mean readable then perhaps this way will suit you.
from collections import Counter
def counter_dict(in_dict):
"""
Create a dict of Counters from a dict of dicts.
"""
return dict((k, Counter(v)) for (k, v) in in_dict.items())
def merge_counter_dicts(a, b):
"""
Create a dict of Counters from two dicts of Counters.
Where keys exist in both counts are summed.
"""
out_dict = a.copy()
for k in b.keys():
out_dict[k] = out_dict.setdefault(k, Counter()) + b[k]
return out_dict
x = {2: {'a': 1, 'b': 1}}
y = {3: {'a': 1}, 2: {'a': 2, 'c': 2}}
xc = counter_dict(x)
xy = counter_dict(y)
print merge_counter_dicts(xc, xy)
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 471
This works:
x = {2: {'a':1, 'b':1}}
y = {3: {'a':1}, 2: {'a':2, 'c':2}}
def key_merge (dict1, dict2):
## function which checks for any matching keys, and merges them
if len(dict1.keys()) == 0 or len(dict2.keys()) == 0:
return {}
else:
for key in dict1.keys():
if key in dict2.keys():
return {key:{ k: dict1[key].get(k, 0) + dict2[key].get(k, 0) for k in set(dict1[key])|set(dict2[key]) }}
z = {**x, **y, **key_merge(x, y)}
Again, up to you if it's elegant!
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 11477
What about this:
For Python2.x:
from collections import Counter
y = {2: {'a': 1, 'b': 1}, 1: {'a': 1, 'b': 1}}
x = {3: {'a': 1}, 2: {'a': 2, 'c': 2}}
t=x.copy()
print(dict({k: (dict(Counter(t.pop(k, None)) + Counter(v))) for k, v in y.items()},**t))
Result:
{1: {'a': 1, 'b': 1}, 2: {'a': 3, 'c': 2, 'b': 1}, 3: {'a': 1}}
For Python3.5+:
{**{k: (dict(Counter(t.pop(k, None)) + Counter(v))) for k, v in y.items()},**t}
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 140186
Use collections.Counter
to "merge" the items you want to merge (only the common keys), and leave the others intact, using a double ternary expression in a dict comprehension, iterating on the union of the keys:
import collections
x = {2: {'a':1, 'b':1}}
y = {3: {'a':1}, 2: {'a':2, 'c':2}}
# pre-compute common keys, one-liners are not the ultimate goal in life!
common_keys = set(x) & set(y)
# now generate the merged dict
result = {k:collections.Counter(x[k])+collections.Counter(y[k]) if k in common_keys else x[k] if k in x else y[k] for k in set(x)|set(y)}
print(result)
result:
{2: Counter({'a': 3, 'c': 2, 'b': 1}), 3: {'a': 1}}
Note: we could have avoided computing the common keys beforehand by replacing:
if k in common_keys
by
if k in x and k in y
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 419
Suppose for any same depth for a certain key, in two dicts the values are of same type (both dict or both number, i don't know how to define merging a number into a dict).
def merge(d1, d2):
for i in d2:
if i not in d1:
continue
if isinstance(d1[i], dict) and isinstance(d2[i], dict):
merge(d1[i], d2[i])
else:
d2[i] += d1[i]
d1.pop(i)
for j in d1:
d2[j] = d1[j]
It's straightforward but maybe not elegant.
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 4866
Here you have a possible solution. Although it doesn't use any library, it is quite complex.
Also it will work with any two dictionaries, independently on which is the largest.
{key: {ikey: x.get(key, {}).get(ikey, 0) + y.get(key, {}).get(ikey, 0)
for ikey in x.get(key, {}).keys()+y.get(key, {}).keys()}
for key in x.keys()+y.keys()}
Output:
{2: {'a': 3, 'b': 1, 'c': 2}, 3: {'a': 1}}
Upvotes: 0