Reputation: 2561
When debugging, I recently noticed that GDB has the ability to evaluate "complex" expressions while debugging a program, and I am wondering how it does this. For example, with the following code:
int main() {
std::vector<int> v = {1, 2, 3};
int k = 0;
std::cin >> k;
v.push_back(k);
return v.at(0);
}
I am able to compile the program g++ -g myprogram.cpp
and debug it in GDB which allows me to type things like print v.at(4);
(which prints the correct value after k
is dynamically entered) and print v.at(2) == 3
which evaluates to true.
I am wondering how GDB does this. This SO question hints that it is something "compiled in memory" but does not elaborate further, so I am wondering does it use some sort of JIT to make this all work or something else? Are they compiling the code inline as I type it and running it? Do they have a framework to evaluate C++ on the fly in the debugging context? In essence, I want to reproduce this in a debugger I am writing to evaluate expressions at breakpoints which is why I am curious how GDB does it.
Upvotes: 11
Views: 5215
Reputation: 711
Short Answer: It does not compile code.
Long Answer:
print
command and the procedure occurs in printcmd.c
evaluate_expression
, defined in eval.c
, which evaluates an expression by reading target memory and calculating it inside gdb for standard operators, otherwise use call_function_by_hand
.call_function_by_hand
is defined in infcall.c
. When called, the procedure halts target execution (sometimes doesn't, so it is possible to crash a multithreaded program with this feature).You may focus on the code of call_function_by_hand
for better understanding.
Note: compile
is a different thing from print
/call
.
Upvotes: 12
Reputation: 35716
which allows me to type things like print v.at(4);
gdb can call functions compiled into the binary. This is exactly what happens here. gdb calls std::vector
member function at()
and prints the result for you, see documentation.
Also note that this is possible because you are using v.at(0)
in your code. If you remove this part of code, v.at()
would not get instantiated and will not be available in the resulting binary so that gdb could not call it.
Upvotes: 10