CODEWITHSUNDEEP
java
pheromix
pheromix

Reputation: 19347

How to speed collection "contains" execution plan?

If I make analogy to Oracle database : they have the notion of "index" and "hint" to speed the execution of a query. So I want to make the analogy to Java : is it possible to make the execution of the "contains" method of a collection to be quick ?

Upvotes: 1

Views: 43

Answers (2)

Peter Lawrey
Peter Lawrey

Reputation: 533660

is it possible to make the execution of the "contains" method of a collection to be quick ?

Yes, use a collection with a faster contains method.

e.g.

HashSet -> O(1)
SortedSet -> O(ln N)
List -> O(N)

The big-O time complexity indicates how the worst case time for an operation as the size of the collection grows. Lower time complexity is faster for modest to large collections.

Note: this only tells you how the collection scales. If the collection is very small like 1 or 2, then a List might be the fastest.

The Big-O notation is well explained What is a plain English explanation of "Big O" notation?

Upvotes: 4

Tamas Rev
Tamas Rev

Reputation: 7166

It depends on what do you want to do with that collection. These are the standard options:

  1. If the order of insertion doesn't matter, then you can use a HashSet. Once you have this Set set up, the contains() method will run in O(constant) time.
  2. Alternatively, you can use a LinkedHashSet. It is almost the same as the HashSet, but it maintains a LinkedList on the top of the Set so you can maintain the order of original insertion.
  3. If you want to maintain the natural ordering of your items, you can use a TreeSet. Its contains() method will return in O(log n) time which is still fairly quick.

If none of these is good for you, then you can have your collection, assign another HashSet and maintain them together. However, I'm afraid that the performance gain isn't justified at most of the cases.

Upvotes: 1

Related Questions