CODEWITHSUNDEEP
rubyperformanceruby-on-rails-4partials
Dan L
Dan L

Reputation: 4439

Rails 4: why is one way of rendering partials so much faster?

I'm not sure if this is a Rails specific issue, hence the reason I tagged it ruby as well.

I'm rendering a collection of event records via a partial. However, I found that rendering the partial differently results in drastic performance differences.

Both version use the exact same data, the only thing changing is the code used to render the partials.

Why the heck is one version consistently 4x faster than the other? Makes me wonder what other performance hits I'm taking...

Slow version (950ms total request time):

<% events.each do |event| %>
  <%= render partial: "events/event", locals: { event: event } %>
<% end %>

# Log output
Rendered events/_event.html.erb (1.1ms)
Rendered events/_event.html.erb (1.1ms) 
...

Faster version (250ms total request time):

<%= render partial: "events/event", collection: events, as: :event %>

# Log output
Rendered events/_event.html.erb (58.7ms)

Upvotes: 11

Views: 3241

Answers (1)

amateur-programateur
amateur-programateur

Reputation: 186

example 1: you are rendering a partial x times (depending on events). which means you are compiling html x times(once each time the loop runs). which is slow

example 2: you are rendering one partial with a collection of events the html is compiled once(as there is only one partial). which is fast

Upvotes: 11

Related Questions