Reputation: 39
Is it possible to have a single inf. rule with more than one constraints on a variable. For example is it possible to extend the following rule
a b c [Constraint b != <rdf:type>]
b <rdfs:domain> d
------------------------------------
a <rdf:type> d
like that (tried but the rule is not activated)
a b c [Constraint b != <rdf:type>, b != <rdfs:label>]
b <rdfs:domain> d
------------------------------------
a <rdf:type> d
Thanks
Upvotes: 0
Views: 110
Reputation: 1193
According to the latest GraphDB documentation this is a valid rule syntax. Both constraints are executed with AND, so the rule will not work for rdf:type
and rdfs:label
values only. Here is the full example:
Prefices
{
rdf : http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
rdfs : http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
}
Axioms
{
}
Rules
{
Id: test
a b c [Constraint b != <rdf:type>, b != <rdfs:label>]
b <rdfs:domain> d
------------------------------------
a <rdf:type> d
}
After inserting the sample file, you will get implicit result only for <urn:a1>
:
<urn:a1> <urn:b1> <urn:c1> .
<urn:b1> <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#domain> <urn:d1> .
<urn:a2> <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label> <urn:c2> .
<urn:b2> <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#domain> <urn:d2> .
Upvotes: 2