Reputation: 464
I have a class that receive variadic templates of the same type. Each of these types have a nested value that should be unique:
template <SomeEnum _se, int _val>
struct Pack
{
enum {val_se = _se};
enum {val = _val};
};
int main()
{
TypeMe<Pack<A_SE, 1>, Pack<B_SE, 2>, Pack<C_SE, 3>> tm_abc; // OK
TypeMe<Pack<A_SE, 1>, Pack<B_SE, 2>, Pack<A_SE, 3>> tm_aba; // Should fail (first and last Pack are templated with A_SE)
(void)tm_abc;
(void)tm_aba;
return (0);
}
The entire test code :
#include <cstdio>
template <typename ... ArgPacks>
class TypeMe
{
public:
TypeMe();
private:
template <typename ... APs>
void cycleAPs();
template <typename AP>
void cycleAP();
};
template <typename ... ArgPacks>
TypeMe<ArgPacks...>::TypeMe()
{
// Maybe the static assertion should go here
cycleAPs<ArgPacks...>();
}
template <typename ... ArgPacks>
template <typename ... APs>
void TypeMe<ArgPacks...>::cycleAPs()
{
int _[] = {0, (cycleAP<APs>(), 0)...};
(void)_;
return ;
}
template <typename ... ArgPacks>
template <typename AP>
void TypeMe<ArgPacks...>::cycleAP()
{
printf("SomeEnum = %d, Val = %d\n", static_cast<int>(AP::val_se), AP::val);
return ;
}
enum SomeEnum
{
A_SE,
B_SE,
C_SE,
MAX
};
template <SomeEnum _se, int _val>
struct Pack
{
enum {val_se = _se};
enum {val = _val};
};
int main()
{
TypeMe<Pack<A_SE, 1>, Pack<B_SE, 2>, Pack<C_SE, 3>> tm_abc; // OK
TypeMe<Pack<A_SE, 1>, Pack<B_SE, 2>, Pack<A_SE, 3>> tm_aba; // Should fail (first and last Pack are templated with A_SE)
(void)tm_abc;
(void)tm_aba;
return (0);
}
Is there a way, in C++0x, to check at compile time that each of the Pack::val_se are different ? or with C++11 ?
Thanks for reading
edit:
Same code but with @MadScientist answer, thanks
#include <cstdio>
template <typename ...Ts>
struct are_mutually_different;
template <typename T>
struct are_mutually_different<T>
{
static const bool value = true;
};
template <typename T1, typename T2, typename ...Ts>
struct are_mutually_different<T1, T2, Ts...>
{
static const bool value = (T1::val_se != T2::val_se) &&
are_mutually_different<T1, Ts...>::value &&
are_mutually_different<T2, Ts...>::value;
};
template <typename ... ArgPacks>
class TypeMe
{
public:
TypeMe();
private:
template <typename ... APs>
void cycleAPs();
template <typename AP>
void cycleAP();
};
template <typename ... ArgPacks>
TypeMe<ArgPacks...>::TypeMe()
{
static_assert(are_mutually_different<ArgPacks...>::value, "!"); // <3
// Maybe the static assertion should go here
cycleAPs<ArgPacks...>();
}
template <typename ... ArgPacks>
template <typename ... APs>
void TypeMe<ArgPacks...>::cycleAPs()
{
int _[] = {0, (cycleAP<APs>(), 0)...};
(void)_;
return ;
}
template <typename ... ArgPacks>
template <typename AP>
void TypeMe<ArgPacks...>::cycleAP()
{
printf("SomeEnum = %d, Val = %d\n", static_cast<int>(AP::val_se), AP::val);
return ;
}
enum SomeEnum
{
A_SE,
B_SE,
C_SE,
MAX
};
template <SomeEnum _se, int _val>
struct Pack
{
enum {val_se = _se};
enum {val = _val};
};
int main()
{
TypeMe<Pack<A_SE, 1>, Pack<B_SE, 2>, Pack<C_SE, 3>> tm_abc; // OK
// TypeMe<Pack<A_SE, 1>, Pack<B_SE, 2>, Pack<A_SE, 3>> tm_aba; // Should fail (first and last Pack are templated with A_SE)
(void)tm_abc;
// (void)tm_aba;
return (0);
}
Upvotes: 1
Views: 127
Reputation: 66230
Hoping that someone else can show a more elegant and simpler solution, I propose the insert of a static_assert()
in TypeMe
and the development with the support of a set of specific (allDifferentEnums
) and generics (allDiffs
and fistDiffs
) type traits.
The following is a simplified but compilable example
#include <type_traits>
enum SomeEnum
{ A_SE, B_SE, C_SE, MAX };
template <SomeEnum _se, int _val>
struct Pack
{ };
template <typename T, T ... ts>
struct firstDiffs;
template <typename T, T t>
struct firstDiffs<T, t> : std::true_type
{ };
template <typename T, T t, T ... ts>
struct firstDiffs<T, t, t, ts...> : std::false_type
{ };
template <typename T, T t, T t0, T ... ts>
struct firstDiffs<T, t, t0, ts...> : firstDiffs<T, t, ts...>
{ };
template <typename T, T ... ts>
struct allDiffs;
template <typename T>
struct allDiffs<T> : std::true_type
{ };
template <typename T, T t, T ... ts>
struct allDiffs<T, t, ts...>
: std::integral_constant<bool, firstDiffs<T, t, ts...>::value &&
allDiffs<T, ts...>::value>
{ };
template <typename...>
struct allDifferentEnums: std::false_type
{ };
template <SomeEnum ... ses, int ... vals>
struct allDifferentEnums<Pack<ses, vals>...> : allDiffs<SomeEnum, ses...>
{ };
template <typename ... ArgPacks>
class TypeMe
{ static_assert(allDifferentEnums<ArgPacks...>::value, "!"); };
int main()
{
// OK
TypeMe<Pack<A_SE, 1>, Pack<B_SE, 2>, Pack<C_SE, 3>> tm_abc;
// static_assert failed "!"
// TypeMe<Pack<A_SE, 1>, Pack<B_SE, 2>, Pack<A_SE, 3>> tm_aba;
(void)tm_abc;
// (void)tm_aba;
}
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 3460
You can solve this problem recursively:
Given the types (T1, T2, T3, ...., Tn)
T1::value != T2::value
must be trueT1::value != Ti::value
must be true for i=3,...,nT2::value != Ti::value
must be true for i=3,...,nIn code, you could do it like this:
#include <type_traits>
template <typename ...Ts>
struct are_mutually_different;
template <typename T>
struct are_mutually_different<T>
{
static const bool value = true;
};
template <typename T1, typename T2, typename ...Ts>
struct are_mutually_different<T1, T2, Ts...>
{
static const bool value = (T1::value != T2::value) &&
are_mutually_different<T1, Ts...>::value &&
are_mutually_different<T2, Ts...>::value;
};
void test()
{
using _1 = std::integral_constant<int, 1>;
using _2 = std::integral_constant<int, 2>;
using _3 = std::integral_constant<int, 3>;
using _4 = std::integral_constant<int, 4>;
using _5 = std::integral_constant<int, 5>;
static_assert(are_mutually_different<_1, _2, _3, _4>::value, ":(");
static_assert(!are_mutually_different<_1, _1, _3, _4>::value, ":(");
static_assert(!are_mutually_different<_1, _2, _1, _4>::value, ":(");
static_assert(!are_mutually_different<_1, _2, _3, _2>::value, ":(");
}
Upvotes: 2