CODEWITHSUNDEEP
c++c++11destructor
Ruslan
Ruslan

Reputation: 19120

Is there any difference between virtual destructor=default and one with empty body?

A virtual destructor which does nothing is

virtual ~ClassName() {}

Since C++11 we can alternatively say:

virtual ~ClassName() = default;

Is there any difference between these two?

Upvotes: 10

Views: 622

Answers (1)

midor
midor

Reputation: 5557

The main difference is that there are rules for defaulted functions that specify under which circumstances they are deleted (cf. ISO c++14(N4296) 8.4, 12.1, 12.4, 12.8)

8.4.2.5: Explicitly-defaulted functions and implicitly-declared functions are collectively called defaulted functions, and the implementation shall provide implicit definitions for them (12.1 12.4, 12.8), which might mean defining them as deleted.

e.g.:

12.4.5: A defaulted destructor for a class X is defined as deleted if: (5.1) — X is a union-like class that has a variant member with a non-trivial destructor, (5.2) — any potentially constructed subobject has class type M (or array thereof) and M has a deleted destructor or a destructor that is inaccessible from the defaulted destructor, (5.3) — or, for a virtual destructor, lookup of the non-array deallocation function results in an ambiguity or in a function that is deleted or inaccessible from the defaulted destructor

In case your use falls into one of the deleted categories, using default will be equivalent to using delete whereas {} won't be.

Upvotes: 7

Related Questions